Michael Prince

963 total citations
37 papers, 583 citations indexed

About

Michael Prince is a scholar working on Media Technology, Education and Architecture. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Prince has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 583 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Media Technology, 17 papers in Education and 13 papers in Architecture. Recurrent topics in Michael Prince's work include Experimental Learning in Engineering (20 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (13 papers) and Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (12 papers). Michael Prince is often cited by papers focused on Experimental Learning in Engineering (20 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (13 papers) and Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (12 papers). Michael Prince collaborates with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and United Kingdom. Michael Prince's co-authors include Richard M. Felder, Rebecca Brent, Maura Borrego, Charles Henderson, Stephanie Cutler, Jeffrey E. Froyd, Katharyn Nottis, Margot Vigeant, Jeffrey Evans and James E. Maneval and has published in prestigious journals such as AIChE Journal, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation and Journal of Engineering Education.

In The Last Decade

Michael Prince

33 papers receiving 544 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Prince United States 11 369 324 94 94 73 37 583
Gregory Mason United States 9 692 1.9× 417 1.3× 53 0.6× 40 0.4× 66 0.9× 32 923
Douglas G. Schmucker United States 5 162 0.4× 147 0.5× 58 0.6× 59 0.6× 81 1.1× 12 427
Elizabeth A. Eschenbach United States 8 143 0.4× 188 0.6× 52 0.6× 82 0.9× 29 0.4× 36 421
Lorraine Fleming United States 12 131 0.4× 142 0.4× 45 0.5× 73 0.8× 14 0.2× 35 388
Dan Budny United States 11 212 0.6× 193 0.6× 26 0.3× 148 1.6× 83 1.1× 49 500
Teodora Shuman United States 7 693 1.9× 412 1.3× 80 0.9× 42 0.4× 66 0.9× 24 874
Sudhir Mehta United States 6 238 0.6× 109 0.3× 21 0.2× 55 0.6× 58 0.8× 22 383
A.A. Waller United States 7 130 0.4× 194 0.6× 56 0.6× 83 0.9× 29 0.4× 23 330
Marisa Orr United States 13 218 0.6× 214 0.7× 33 0.4× 106 1.1× 17 0.2× 86 463
Jacquelyn Sullivan United States 13 222 0.6× 413 1.3× 128 1.4× 303 3.2× 42 0.6× 57 673

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Prince

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Prince's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Prince with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Prince more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Prince

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Prince. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Prince. The network helps show where Michael Prince may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Prince

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Prince. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Prince based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Prince. Michael Prince is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Prince, Michael, et al.. (2023). Adjustable prosthetic sockets: a systematic review of industrial and research design characteristics and their justifications. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 20(1). 147–147. 12 indexed citations
2.
Prince, Michael, Margot Vigeant, & Katharyn Nottis. (2020). Development Of A Concept Inventory In Heat Transfer. 14.469.1–14.469.14. 5 indexed citations
3.
Self, Brian, et al.. (2020). Inquiry-Based Learning Activities in Dynamics. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 23.761.1–23.761.19. 4 indexed citations
4.
Nottis, Katharyn, et al.. (2020). The Effect of Inquiry-Based Activities and Prior Knowledge on Undergraduates' Understanding of Reversibility. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 23.1191.1–23.1191.19. 2 indexed citations
5.
Prince, Michael, Margot Vigeant, & Katharyn Nottis. (2020). Assessment and repair of critical misconceptions in engineering heat transfer and thermodynamics. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 23.221.1–23.221.6. 8 indexed citations
7.
Nottis, Katharyn, et al.. (2020). Computer Simulations vs.Physical Experiments: A Gender Comparison of Implementation Methods for Inquiry-Based Heat Transfer Activities. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 1 indexed citations
8.
Prince, Michael, et al.. (2019). Promoting lasting change in teaching practices through a summer immersion faculty development program. International journal of engineering education. 35(3). 968–985. 5 indexed citations
9.
Prince, Michael, Margot Vigeant, & Katharyn Nottis. (2016). Repairing Student Misconceptions in Heat Transfer Using Inquiry-Based Activities.. Chemical Engineering Education. 50(1). 52–61. 13 indexed citations
11.
Kim, Charles, Alan Cheville, Michael Prince, et al.. (2016). Instilling an Entrepreneurial Mindset through IDEAS Studio Courses. 7 indexed citations
12.
Prince, Michael, et al.. (2013). Use of Research-Based Instructional Strategies in Core Chemical Engineering Courses.. Chemical Engineering Education. 47(1). 27–37. 57 indexed citations
13.
Froyd, Jeffrey E., Maura Borrego, Stephanie Cutler, Charles Henderson, & Michael Prince. (2013). Estimates of Use of Research-Based Instructional Strategies in Core Electrical or Computer Engineering Courses. IEEE Transactions on Education. 56(4). 393–399. 83 indexed citations
14.
Cutler, Stephanie, Maura Borrego, Michael Prince, Charles Henderson, & Jeffrey E. Froyd. (2012). A comparison of electrical, computer, and chemical engineering facultys' progressions through the innovation-decision process. 1–5. 19 indexed citations
15.
Vigeant, Margot, Michael Prince, & Katharyn Nottis. (2011). Fundamental Research in Engineering Education. Development of Concept Questions and Inquiry-Based Activities in Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer: An Example for Equilibrium vs. Steady-State.. Chemical Engineering Education. 45(3). 211–218. 5 indexed citations
16.
Prince, Michael, et al.. (2011). Integration of Biological Applications into the Core Undergraduate Curriculum: A Practical Strategy.. Chemical Engineering Education. 45(1). 39–46. 1 indexed citations
17.
Prince, Michael, Margot Vigeant, & Katharyn Nottis. (2010). Assessing Misconceptions of Undergraduate Engineering Students in the Thermal Sciences. International journal of engineering education. 26(4). 880–890. 17 indexed citations
18.
Evans, Jeffrey & Michael Prince. (1997). Additive effectiveness in minerally-enhanced slurry walls. 181–196. 6 indexed citations
19.
Prince, Michael, et al.. (1993). Bioremediation of petroleum wastes from the refining of lubricant oils. Environmental Progress. 12(1). 5–11. 10 indexed citations
20.
Prince, Michael & Harvey W. Blanch. (1990). Bubble Coalescence and Break-up in Air Sparged Biochemical Reactors. AIChE Journal. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026