Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
About
In The Last Decade
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
2.1k papers receiving 76.0k citations
Fields of papers published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.
Countries where authors publish in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation more than expected).
- A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation (2012)
- Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review (2015)
- A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation (2014)
- Gait variability: methods, modeling and meaning (2005)
- JNER: a forum to discuss how neuroscience and biomedical engineering are reshaping physical medicine & rehabilitation (2004)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.