Michael L. Berbaum

88 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Michael L. Berbaum
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Applied Psychology 149
  • Family Practice 63
  • General Health Professions 678
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 451
  • Development 81
Replace Christopher Williams with:
Christopher Williams Australia
Benjamin Lê Cook United States
Holly Blake United Kingdom
Rebecca Rees United Kingdom
Muayyad Ahmad Jordan
Joseph T. Hepworth United States
Patrick M. Krueger United States
Rita K. Noonan United States
A Niroshan Siriwardena United Kingdom
Julie Barlow United Kingdom
Michael L. Berbaum relative to Christopher Williams Australia Christopher Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27×
Christopher Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael L. Berbaum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael L. Berbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael L. Berbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael L. Berbaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael L. Berbaum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael L. Berbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael L. Berbaum. The network helps show where Michael L. Berbaum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael L. Berbaum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael L. Berbaum Line = papers co-authored together Michael L. Berbaum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202310
2 20230
3 20221
4 20182
5 20178
6 201617
7 20166
8 201515
9 20145
10 20149
11 201127
12 201175
13 201059
14 200717
15 200722
16 2006168
17 200510
18 199843
19
How an Attention-Getting Device Can Affect Quick Choice Among Similar Alternatives
19878
20 19850

About Michael L. Berbaum

Michael L. Berbaum is a scholar working on Family Practice, Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions, Periodontics and Applied Psychology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (10 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (9 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (7 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (6 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (5 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers) and Dental Health and Care Utilization (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (149 citations), Family Practice (63 citations), General Health Professions (678 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (451 citations) and Development (81 citations). Michael L. Berbaum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kevin S. Berbaum, Elvira V. Lang, Bruce Russett, John R. Oneal, Robin J. Mermelstein, Susan K. Lutgendorf, Henrietta L. Logan, David Spiegel, Eric G. Benotsch and Ben S. Gerber. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Clinical Trials, Developmental Psychology, Academic Radiology, Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy and Child Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026