Academic Radiology

6.9k papers and 110.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.9k papers published in Academic Radiology in the last decades have received a total of 110.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Academic Radiology usually cover Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (4.2k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.5k papers) and Biomedical Engineering (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Radiology practices and education (1.3k papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1.0k papers) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (968 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Academic Radiology are Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Charles E. Metz, Kevin S. Berbaum, Maryellen L. Giger, Nancy A. Obuchowski, Richard B. Gunderman, Dev P. Chakraborty, Eric A. Hoffman, S. Nahum Goldberg and David Gur.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Academic Radiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Academic Radiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Academic Radiology.

Countries where authors publish in Academic Radiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Academic Radiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Academic Radiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Academic Radiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025