Michael Hoover
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Surgery
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Veena D. DwivediGreg ReidSebastian DemyttenaereMelina C. VassiliouLiane S. FeldmanBenilde García CabreroSusanne P. LajoieSimon Bergman
- Topics
- Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (4 papers)Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers)Innovative Education and Learning Practices (2 papers)
- Journals
- Teaching and Teacher EducationLanguage LearningEducational Technology Research and Development
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Michael Hoover
27 papers receiving 350 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 106
- Surgery 81
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 69
- Cognitive Neuroscience 68
- Sociology and Political Science 60
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Hoover
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Hoover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Hoover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Hoover more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Hoover
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Hoover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Hoover. The network helps show where Michael Hoover may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Hoover
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Hoover. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Hoover based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Hoover. Michael Hoover is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 83 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | City on Fire: Hong Kong Cinema | 31 |
| 18 | 67 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Michael Hoover
Michael Hoover is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Family Practice, having authored 28 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (4 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers) and Innovative Education and Learning Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (106 citations), Family Practice (10 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (68 citations). Michael Hoover has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Veena D. Dwivedi, Greg Reid, Sebastian Demyttenaere, Melina C. Vassiliou, Liane S. Feldman, Benilde García Cabrero, Susanne P. Lajoie, Simon Bergman, Nancy Posel and David Fleiszer. Their work appears in journals such as Teaching and Teacher Education, Language Learning and Educational Technology Research and Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.