Michael Hein

11 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers

Michael Hein
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 197
  • Social Psychology 247
  • Applied Psychology 52
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 119
  • Communication 52
Replace George B. Forsythe with:
George B. Forsythe United States
Douglas A. Johnson United States
Tracy D. Hecht Canada
Michael Howe United States
Victoria L. Pace United States
William J. Becker United States
Bethany H. Bynum United States
Peg Thoms United States
Kevin Tasa Canada
Janelle A. Gilbert United States
Michael Hein relative to George B. Forsythe United States George B. Forsythe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
George B. Forsythe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Hein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Hein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Hein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Hein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Hein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Hein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Hein. The network helps show where Michael Hein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Michael Hein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Hein Line = papers co-authored together Michael Hein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1991372
2 2008114
3 200185
4 202014
5 201613
6 19978
7 19935
8
Improving Aviation Students’ Teamwork, Problem Solving, Coordination, and Communications Skills During a High-Fidelity Simulation
20172
9 20221
10 20241
11 19971

About Michael Hein

Michael Hein is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies and Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (2 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Design Education and Practice (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (197 citations), Social Psychology (247 citations), Applied Psychology (52 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (119 citations) and Communication (52 citations). Michael Hein has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael D. Mumford, Stephen J. Zaccaro, Arthur L. Korotkin, Kerry Levin, Edwin A. Fleishman, Thomas M. Brinthaupt, Jack M. Feldman, Richard G. Moffett, Ben Stickle and Glenn E. Littlepage. Their work appears in journals such as Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, The Journal of Creative Behavior, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Policing An International Journal and Journal of Personality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact