Michael E. Knowles

26 papers receiving 582 citations

Peers

Michael E. Knowles
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 200
  • Animal Science and Zoology 82
  • Analytical Chemistry 70
  • Cancer Research 84
  • Food Science 100
Replace A. E. Wasserman with:
A. E. Wasserman United States
Frank L Joe United States
John J. Ryan United States
Susan Strange Herrmann Denmark
V. Kubelka India
Phillip Issenberg United States
Harry M. Pylypiw United States
P. J. Wagstaffe Belgium
So-Young Chung South Korea
Sadao UCHIYAMA Japan
Michael E. Knowles relative to A. E. Wasserman United States A. E. Wasserman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
A. E. Wasserman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Knowles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Knowles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Knowles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Knowles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Knowles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Knowles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Knowles. The network helps show where Michael E. Knowles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Knowles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Knowles Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Knowles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983160
2 197470
3 197456
4 197545
5 198234
6 198233
7 198432
8 197528
9 198427
10 197526
11 198521
12 198516
13 197416
14 198412
15
An investigation of apparent total N-nitroso compounds in beer.
19879
16 19849
17 19719
18 19748
19 19787
20 19857

About Michael E. Knowles

Michael E. Knowles is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Animal Science and Zoology, Biomedical Engineering, Analytical Chemistry and Food Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 648 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (5 papers), Water Treatment and Disinfection (4 papers), Dye analysis and toxicity (3 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (2 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (2 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (2 papers) and Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (200 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (82 citations), Analytical Chemistry (70 citations), Cancer Research (84 citations) and Food Science (100 citations). Michael E. Knowles has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David J. McWeeny, R. C. Massey, John Gilbert, Michael J. Dennis, David M. Watson, Margaret Thorogood, P. E. Key, Colin Crews, Jacque H. Georger and Michael F. Rubner. Their work appears in journals such as Food Additives & Contaminants, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Nature, International Journal of Food Science & Technology and Food and Chemical Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact