M.F. Pool

797 citations
23 papers · 629 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

M.F. Pool

23 papers receiving 561 citations

Peers

M.F. Pool
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Animal Science and Zoology 513
  • Small Animals 62
  • Biochemistry 40
  • Food Science 99
  • Insect Science 51
Replace J. Wismer‐Pedersen with:
J. Wismer‐Pedersen Denmark
Richard C. Jones United States
W. A. Landmann United States
E.A. Gullett Canada
JANE A. BOWERS United States
Robin E. Jeacocke United Kingdom
Dick Whittier United States
G. Torrescano Mexico
Berna Özalp Türkiye
John G. Kapsalis United States
M.F. Pool relative to J. Wismer‐Pedersen Denmark J. Wismer‐Pedersen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J. Wismer‐Pedersen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.F. Pool

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.F. Pool's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.F. Pool with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.F. Pool more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.F. Pool

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.F. Pool. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.F. Pool. The network helps show where M.F. Pool may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside M.F. Pool, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.F. Pool Line = papers co-authored together M.F. Pool links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1960177
2 195654
3 196347
4 195140
5 197137
6 196931
7 197229
8 195625
9 196022
10 195420
11 197120
12
Effects of ethanol and chlordiazepoxide on social interaction in rats [proceedings].
197620
13 196717
14 196116
15 197215
16 197114
17 196212
18 19659
19 19548
20 19597

About M.F. Pool

M.F. Pool is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals, Biomaterials, Biochemistry and Insect Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 629 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (16 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (15 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers), Fluoride Effects and Removal (2 papers), Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (2 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (513 citations), Small Animals (62 citations), Biochemistry (40 citations), Food Science (99 citations) and Insect Science (51 citations). M.F. Pool has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Donald de Fremery, A.A. Klose, E. Mecchi, R. N. Sayre, Masaaki Hamachi, Hans Lineweaver, H. G. Bayne, Sandra E. File, J.R.G. Hyde and Helen Hanson. Their work appears in journals such as Poultry Science, Journal of Food Science, Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact