Mette D. Hersby
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Gender Politics and Representation
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Papers in
-
- Gender Diversity and Inequality 4
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior 3
- Management and Organizational Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Michelle K. Ryan (4 shared papers)S. Alexander Haslam (2 shared papers)Renata Bongiorno (1 shared paper)Jolanda Jetten (2 shared papers)Tim Rakow (1 shared paper)Ben R. Newell (1 shared paper)Clara Kulich (1 shared paper)Michael T. Schmitt (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Applied Psychology (1 paper)Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (1 paper)Social and Personality Psychology Compass (1 paper)British Journal of Management (1 paper)Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Mette D. Hersby
5 papers receiving 388 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Gender Studies 299
- General Decision Sciences 28
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 140
- Accounting 60
- Sociology and Political Science 161
Countries citing papers authored by Mette D. Hersby
This map shows the geographic impact of Mette D. Hersby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mette D. Hersby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mette D. Hersby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mette D. Hersby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mette D. Hersby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mette D. Hersby. The network helps show where Mette D. Hersby may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Mette D. Hersby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 302 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 41 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 14 |
About Mette D. Hersby
Mette D. Hersby is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 5 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Mentoring and Academic Development (2 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper), Management and Organizational Studies (1 paper), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (1 paper), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Higher Education Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (299 citations), General Decision Sciences (28 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (140 citations), Accounting (60 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (161 citations). Mette D. Hersby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Michelle K. Ryan, S. Alexander Haslam, Renata Bongiorno, Jolanda Jetten, Tim Rakow, Ben R. Newell, Clara Kulich and Michael T. Schmitt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, British Journal of Management and Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.