Tim Rakow

4.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
64 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Tim Rakow is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Economics and Econometrics and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Tim Rakow has authored 64 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in General Decision Sciences, 22 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Tim Rakow's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (36 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (10 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (9 papers). Tim Rakow is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (36 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (10 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (9 papers). Tim Rakow collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Israel. Tim Rakow's co-authors include Ben R. Newell, J. Richard Eiser, Alireza Daneshkhah, David J. Jenkinson, Caitlin E. Buck, Jeremy E. Oakley, Paul H. Garthwaite, Anthony O’Hagan, Sheina Orbell and Marco Perugini and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Nature Climate Change.

In The Last Decade

Tim Rakow

63 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Hit Papers

Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tim Rakow United Kingdom 23 752 459 389 342 329 64 2.6k
A. A. J. Marley Canada 24 831 1.1× 1.5k 3.2× 401 1.0× 422 1.2× 86 0.3× 96 3.1k
Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos Germany 27 689 0.9× 530 1.2× 546 1.4× 150 0.4× 105 0.3× 89 2.4k
Marcel A. L. M. van Assen Netherlands 38 168 0.2× 1.2k 2.7× 207 0.5× 326 1.0× 258 0.8× 126 5.6k
L. Jonathan Cohen United Kingdom 25 757 1.0× 341 0.7× 170 0.4× 338 1.0× 83 0.3× 116 3.3k
Stefan M. Herzog Germany 22 492 0.7× 212 0.5× 253 0.7× 258 0.8× 151 0.5× 57 1.7k
Donald G. MacGregor United States 23 627 0.8× 394 0.9× 232 0.6× 315 0.9× 449 1.4× 59 3.9k
Barbara Fasolo United Kingdom 19 287 0.4× 247 0.5× 233 0.6× 109 0.3× 110 0.3× 36 1.4k
Kenneth R. Hammond United States 37 1.4k 1.8× 604 1.3× 1.1k 2.9× 504 1.5× 330 1.0× 93 5.3k
J. Richard Eiser United Kingdom 42 401 0.5× 388 0.8× 276 0.7× 367 1.1× 1.1k 3.4× 218 7.3k
Edgar C. Merkle United States 21 195 0.3× 118 0.3× 317 0.8× 202 0.6× 72 0.2× 72 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Rakow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Rakow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Rakow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Rakow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Rakow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Rakow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Rakow. The network helps show where Tim Rakow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim Rakow

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim Rakow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim Rakow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tim Rakow. Tim Rakow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wright, Rebecca & Tim Rakow. (2023). Testing the somatic marker hypothesis in decisions-from-experience with non-stationary outcome probabilities. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. 1195009–1195009. 1 indexed citations
2.
Rakow, Tim, et al.. (2022). The day after the disaster: Risk-taking following large- and small-scale disasters in a microworld. Judgment and Decision Making. 17(3). 513–546. 2 indexed citations
3.
Bates, Ian, et al.. (2021). Clinical Judgement Analysis: An innovative approach to explore the individual decision-making processes of pharmacists. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 17(12). 2097–2107. 2 indexed citations
4.
Rakow, Tim, et al.. (2021). Understanding the relationship between safety beliefs and knowledge for cognitive enhancers in UK university students. PLoS ONE. 16(1). e0244865–e0244865. 5 indexed citations
5.
Rakow, Tim, et al.. (2020). Losing my loss aversion: The effects of current and past environment on the relative sensitivity to losses and gains. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 27(6). 1333–1340. 9 indexed citations
6.
Newell, Ben R., et al.. (2019). Further investigations of how rare disaster information affects risk taking: A registered replication report. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 26(4). 1411–1417. 6 indexed citations
7.
Ashby, Nathaniel J. S., Tim Rakow, & Eldad Yechiam. (2017). ‘Tis better to choose and lose than to never choose at all. Judgment and Decision Making. 12(6). 553–562. 3 indexed citations
8.
Pagel, Christina, et al.. (2017). Understanding Children’s Heart Surgery Data: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach to Codevelop a Website. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 104(1). 342–352. 3 indexed citations
9.
Bindemann, Markus, et al.. (2012). Who can recognize unfamiliar faces? Individual differences and observer consistency in person identification.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 18(3). 277–291. 60 indexed citations
10.
Rakow, Tim. (2010). Risk, uncertainty and prophet: The psychological insights of Frank H. Knight. Judgment and Decision Making. 5(6). 458–466. 22 indexed citations
11.
Rakow, Tim, et al.. (2009). Developmental insights into experience‐based decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 23(1). 69–82. 39 indexed citations
12.
Rakow, Tim, et al.. (2009). Doomed to repeat the successes of the past: History is best forgotten for repeated choices with nonstationary payoffs. Memory & Cognition. 37(7). 985–1000. 35 indexed citations
13.
Li, Simon Y. W., Tim Rakow, & Ben R. Newell. (2009). Personal experience in doctor and patient decision making: from psychology to medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 15(6). 993–995. 14 indexed citations
14.
Andersson, Patric & Tim Rakow. (2007). Now you see it now you don't: The effectiveness of the recognition heuristic for selecting stocks. Judgment and Decision Making. 2(1). 29–39. 13 indexed citations
15.
Andersson, Patric & Tim Rakow. (2007). Now you see it now you don’t: The effectiveness of the recognition heuristic for selecting stock. Judgment and Decision Making. 2. 29–39. 12 indexed citations
16.
Newell, Ben R. & Tim Rakow. (2007). The role of experience in decisions from description. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 14(6). 1133–1139. 67 indexed citations
17.
Orbell, Sheina, Marco Perugini, & Tim Rakow. (2004). Individual Differences in Sensitivity to Health Communications: Consideration of Future Consequences.. Health Psychology. 23(4). 388–396. 141 indexed citations
18.
Rakow, Tim. (2003). Same patient, different advice: a study into why doctors vary. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 88(6). 497–502. 3 indexed citations
20.
Furnham, Adrian, et al.. (1999). European differences in self-perceived multiple intelligences. European Psychologist, 3, 1999, 131-138.. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026