Melanie De Vocht
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
-
- Media Influence and Health 3
- Food Science top 10%
- Food Safety and Hygiene 3
- Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability 2
-
- Digital Games and Media 6
- Risk Perception and Management 4
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 4
-
- Personality Traits and Psychology 2
-
- Public Relations and Crisis Communication 1
In The Last Decade
Melanie De Vocht
10 papers receiving 427 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Human-Computer Interaction 97
- Literature and Literary Theory 132
- Food Science 100
- Applied Psychology 25
- Biotechnology 39
Countries citing papers authored by Melanie De Vocht
This map shows the geographic impact of Melanie De Vocht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanie De Vocht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanie De Vocht more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Melanie De Vocht
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanie De Vocht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanie De Vocht. The network helps show where Melanie De Vocht may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Melanie De Vocht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 154 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 195 | |
| 6 | Risk perception towards emerging food safety risks on fresh produce: the impact of governmental trust on evoked fear | 2011 | 1 |
| 7 | Self-discrepancy and MMORPGs: testing the moderating effects of avatar identification and pathological gaming in world of warcraft | 2011 | 5 |
| 8 | Player Identification in Online Games: Validation of a Scale for Measuring Identification in MMORPGs | 2010 | 12 |
| 9 | Playing a Self: an Exploration into the Effect of Avatar Identification on Gamer Ratings of Self, Ideal Self and Avatar Personality in MMORPGs | 2010 | 1 |
| 10 | 2010 | 38 | |
| 11 | Informatieve website over gaming | 2009 | 1 |
About Melanie De Vocht
Melanie De Vocht is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Food Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (6 papers), Risk Perception and Management (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Food Safety and Hygiene (3 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (2 papers), Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (2 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (97 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (132 citations) and Food Science (100 citations). Melanie De Vocht has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Jan Van Looy, Cédric Courtois, Lieven De Marez, Mieke Uyttendaele, Leen Baert, Pieter Spanoghe, Liesbeth Jacxsens, Andreja Rajković, Francisco López‐Gálvez and Imca Sampers. Their work appears in journals such as Food Control, Journal of Food Protection and Media Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.