Mark McMahon

700 total citations
44 papers, 437 citations indexed

About

Mark McMahon is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Computer Science Applications. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark McMahon has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 437 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Education, 16 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 6 papers in Computer Science Applications. Recurrent topics in Mark McMahon's work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (11 papers), Online and Blended Learning (7 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (6 papers). Mark McMahon is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (11 papers), Online and Blended Learning (7 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (6 papers). Mark McMahon collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Mark McMahon's co-authors include Prabhakar Goel, Ron Oliver, Joseph Luca, Anita Bundy, Nicola Hancock, Michael Garrett, James C. Torner, John L. Fiedler, Tracy Young and Hope M. Tiesman and has published in prestigious journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Neurotrauma.

In The Last Decade

Mark McMahon

39 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark McMahon Australia 10 126 107 100 70 59 44 437
Cristina Costa-Lobo Portugal 11 136 1.1× 41 0.4× 187 1.9× 14 0.2× 21 0.4× 81 555
Brian Jones United States 11 25 0.2× 24 0.2× 85 0.8× 13 0.2× 33 0.6× 37 615
Daniel Ziegler United States 10 50 0.4× 54 0.5× 11 0.1× 38 0.5× 46 0.8× 35 463
Νεκταρία Παλαιολόγου Greece 8 157 1.2× 19 0.2× 28 0.3× 6 0.1× 83 1.4× 40 338
Bob Fox Hong Kong 13 238 1.9× 5 0.0× 51 0.5× 50 0.7× 38 0.6× 25 430
Lisa Neal United States 9 51 0.4× 9 0.1× 6 0.1× 48 0.7× 40 0.7× 51 279
Michael Clancy United States 17 157 1.2× 13 0.1× 7 0.1× 375 5.4× 38 0.6× 49 1.0k
Karen Appleby United States 11 16 0.1× 42 0.4× 16 0.2× 31 0.4× 44 0.7× 31 504
Maria-Iuliana Dascălu Romania 11 111 0.9× 3 0.0× 19 0.2× 99 1.4× 33 0.6× 83 498
N. Hine United Kingdom 11 46 0.4× 9 0.1× 9 0.1× 18 0.3× 18 0.3× 20 333

Countries citing papers authored by Mark McMahon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark McMahon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark McMahon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark McMahon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark McMahon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark McMahon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark McMahon. The network helps show where Mark McMahon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark McMahon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark McMahon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark McMahon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark McMahon. Mark McMahon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rogers, Shane L., et al.. (2020). A Novel Approach to Measure Executive Functions in Students: An Evaluation of Two Child-Friendly Apps. Frontiers in Psychology. 11. 1702–1702. 4 indexed citations
2.
McMahon, Mark, et al.. (2019). The eFun App: A New Tool to Measure Executive Functions to Support Learning in a Child-Friendly, Valid and Engaging Way.. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 76–85. 1 indexed citations
3.
McMahon, Mark & Michael Garrett. (2016). Mind vs. Machine: A comparison between human analysis and autonomous natural language processing in the classification of learning outcomes. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 641–649. 1 indexed citations
4.
Garrett, Michael & Mark McMahon. (2013). Generalised design guidelines for supporting knowledge construction and Learning Transfer using 3D, Problem-based Learning Environments. Research Online (Edith Cowan University). 2013(1). 883–893. 1 indexed citations
5.
McMahon, Mark, et al.. (2012). Press Any Key: Repositioning digital literacy as an enabler for self-regulated learning. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 2012(1). 632–637.
6.
Garrett, Michael & Mark McMahon. (2011). Exploring the Use of Audio-Visual Feedback within 3D Virtual Environments to Provide Complex Sensory Cues for Scenario-Based Learning. ASCILITE Publications. 412–422. 2 indexed citations
7.
McMahon, Mark, et al.. (2011). Exploring the Nature of Immersion in Games to Enhance Educational Engagement. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 2011(1). 1395–1402. 1 indexed citations
8.
McMahon, Mark, et al.. (2011). The natives are restless: meeting the diversity and needs of millennial students in a large undergraduate unit. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 476–481. 2 indexed citations
9.
McMahon, Mark. (2009). Using the DODDEL model to teach serious game design to novice designers. ASCILITE Publications. 645–653. 11 indexed citations
10.
McMahon, Mark, et al.. (2008). A Model of Immersion to Guide the Design of Serious Games. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 2008(1). 1833–1842. 7 indexed citations
11.
McMahon, Mark & Joseph Luca. (2007). Explorations in Metacognition: The design, development, and implementation of an online teamwork tracking environment. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 676–685.
12.
McMahon, Mark, et al.. (2007). A Self-Assessment Tool to Help Learners Develop Teamwork Skills. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 2007(1). 2913–2920. 3 indexed citations
13.
Luca, Joseph & Mark McMahon. (2006). Developing Multidisciplinary Teams through Self-Assessment, Supported with Online Tools. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 2006(1). 2357–2363. 8 indexed citations
14.
McMahon, Mark & Joseph Luca. (2005). Developing Metacognition through Student Contracts. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 2005(1). 3260–3268. 1 indexed citations
15.
McMahon, Mark & Ron Oliver. (2004). Design Experiments as a Research Methodology for Innovation in ICT. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2004(1). 2026–2033. 1 indexed citations
16.
McMahon, Mark & Ron Oliver. (2003). Teaching metacognitive regulation of reading comprehension in an on-line environment. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 2003(1). 2464–2471. 9 indexed citations
17.
McMahon, Mark & Ron Oliver. (2001). Promoting self-regulated learning in an on-line environment. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 2001(1). 1299–1305. 29 indexed citations
18.
McMahon, Mark. (2000). Developing Web-based Learning Strategies: a comparison between the Web and traditional learning environments. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2000(1). 693–701. 2 indexed citations
19.
McMahon, Mark & Joseph Luca. (2000). Courseware Management Tools and Customised Web Pages: Rationale, Comparisons and Evaluation. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2000(1). 687–692. 6 indexed citations
20.
Goel, Prabhakar & Mark McMahon. (1982). Electronic Chip-In-Place Test. Design Automation Conference. 482–488. 64 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026