Mark Lejk

610 total citations
10 papers, 452 citations indexed

About

Mark Lejk is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Lejk has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 452 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Education, 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 1 paper in Communication. Recurrent topics in Mark Lejk's work include Student Assessment and Feedback (5 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers). Mark Lejk is often cited by papers focused on Student Assessment and Feedback (5 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers). Mark Lejk collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Botswana. Mark Lejk's co-authors include Stephen Farrow and J.B. Thompson and has published in prestigious journals such as Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Software Quality Journal and South African Journal of Higher Education.

In The Last Decade

Mark Lejk

10 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark Lejk United Kingdom	7	360	99	87	54	44	10	452
Douglas Magin Australia	9	348 1.0×	140 1.4×	73 0.8×	47 0.9×	19 0.4×	18	492
Hal Pomeranz United States	4	177 0.5×	166 1.7×	89 1.0×	55 1.0×	33 0.8×	16	436
Barbara J. Duch United States	7	531 1.5×	135 1.4×	119 1.4×	31 0.6×	28 0.6×	11	672
Sue Bloxham United Kingdom	13	651 1.8×	46 0.5×	65 0.7×	27 0.5×	12 0.3×	16	747
Phil Race United Kingdom	10	248 0.7×	28 0.3×	58 0.7×	35 0.6×	20 0.5×	43	424
Bhavani Sridharan Australia	10	220 0.6×	31 0.3×	52 0.6×	41 0.8×	19 0.4×	22	328
Joanna Bull United Kingdom	9	485 1.3×	82 0.8×	111 1.3×	112 2.1×	8 0.2×	19	650
Kevin Ashford-Rowe Australia	8	306 0.8×	38 0.4×	49 0.6×	105 1.9×	23 0.5×	18	507
Beryl C. McEwen United States	4	326 0.9×	18 0.2×	73 0.8×	45 0.8×	38 0.9×	10	391
Teri Reed United States	9	270 0.8×	177 1.8×	51 0.6×	17 0.3×	139 3.2×	32	499

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Lejk

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Lejk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Lejk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Lejk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Lejk

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Lejk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Lejk. The network helps show where Mark Lejk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Lejk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Lejk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Lejk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Lejk. Mark Lejk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Lejk, Mark, et al.. (2013). Enhancing student learning, participation and accountability in undergraduate group projects through peer assessment. South African Journal of Higher Education. 27(2). 368–382. 3 indexed citations

2.

Thompson, J.B., et al.. (2006). PisoSIA® a stakeholder approach to assist change in information systems development projects and aid process improvement. Software Quality Journal. 14(1). 25–36. 5 indexed citations

3.

Lejk, Mark, et al.. (2002). Peer Assessment of Contributions to a Group Project: Student attitudes to holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 27(6). 569–577. 38 indexed citations

4.

Lejk, Mark, et al.. (2002). A Report of the use of the PISO (Process Improvement for Strategic Objectives) Method in an NHS Trust Hospital. 2 indexed citations

5.

Lejk, Mark, et al.. (2001). The Effect of the Inclusion of Selfassessment with Peer Assessment of Contributions to a Group Project: A quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 26(6). 551–561. 95 indexed citations

6.

Lejk, Mark, et al.. (2001). Peer Assessment of Contributions to a Group Project: A comparison of holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 26(1). 61–72. 111 indexed citations

7.

Lejk, Mark, et al.. (1999). Group Assessment in Systems Analysis and Design: a comparison of the performance of streamed and mixed‐ability groups. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 24(1). 5–14. 45 indexed citations

8.

Lejk, Mark, et al.. (1998). An introduction to systems analysis techniques. 12 indexed citations

9.

Lejk, Mark, et al.. (1997). Group Learning and Group Assessment on Undergraduate Computing Courses in Higher Education in the UK: results of a survey. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 22(1). 81–91. 37 indexed citations

10.

Lejk, Mark, et al.. (1996). A Survey of Methods of Deriving Individual Grades from Group Assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 21(3). 267–280. 104 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact