Replace International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering with:
International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge EngineeringChina
Journal of Software Evolution and ProcessChina
Automated Software EngineeringUnited States
Software & Systems ModelingGermany
Journal of Visual Languages & ComputingUnited States
IET SoftwareChina
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and MethodologyChina
The Journal of Object TechnologyUnited States
QueueUnited States
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology TransferUnited States
International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge EngineeringChinaView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Software Quality Journal
Software Quality Journal · 1×
×0.76.2kIS
×0.53.4kSOFTW
×1.44.3kAI
×0.92.5kCNC
×0.91.2kMIS
Citations per year, relative to Software Quality Journal
Software Quality Journal · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Software Quality Journal
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Software Quality Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Software Quality Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Software Quality Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Software Quality Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in Software Quality Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Software Quality Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.