Software Quality Journal

About

The 839 papers published in Software Quality Journal in the last decades have received a total of 13.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Software Quality Journal usually cover Information Systems (610 papers), Software (460 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (191 papers) specifically the topics of Software Engineering Research (494 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (352 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (270 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Software Quality Journal are Nigel Bevan, Ahmed Seffah, Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar, Mario Piattini, Markus Pizka, Florian Deissenboeck, Tracy Hall, Rex B. Kline, Harkirat Padda and Witold Suryn.

In The Last Decade

Software Quality Journal

764 papers receiving 12.4k citations

Countries where authors publish in Software Quality Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Software Quality Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Software Quality Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Software Quality Journal more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Software Quality Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Software Quality Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Software Quality Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026