Mark King

626 citations
15 papers · 338 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mark King

14 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Mark King
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Gender Studies 77
  • Social Psychology 109
  • Education 103
  • Sociology and Political Science 145
  • Clinical Psychology 58
Replace Santiago Resett with:
Santiago Resett Argentina
Ruchi Bhanot United States
Sog Yee Mok Germany
Daniel Z. Grunspan United States
Margaret E. Madden United States
Jonathan P. Rossing United States
Nancy N. Truong United States
Inmaculada Marín‐López Spain
Silvia Di Battista Italy
Gürbüz Ocak Türkiye
Mark King relative to Santiago Resett Argentina Santiago Resett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Santiago Resett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark King. The network helps show where Mark King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Mark King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark King Line = papers co-authored together Mark King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1
The Role of Secure Knowledge in Enabling Year 7 to Write Essays on Magna Carta.
20150
2 20146
3 201414
4
Maintaining a 'digital profile' under web 2.0
20131
5 201314
6 201312
7 201345
8
New Technologies in the Classroom: How We Can Understand the Link Between Strong Pedagogy, Student Learning, and the Application of New Technologies
20121
9 201241
10 201122
11 20115
12 201026
13 2009109
14 200920
15 200722

About Mark King

Mark King is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Software, Gender Studies, Social Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 15 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (2 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Mobile Learning in Education (2 papers), Online and Blended Learning (2 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (77 citations), Social Psychology (109 citations), Education (103 citations), Sociology and Political Science (145 citations) and Clinical Psychology (58 citations). Mark King has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Sam Winter, Beverley Webster, Daniel Churchill, Bob Fox, Paul Bergey, Li Ling, Baoci Shan, Ling Li, Jian Xu and Yan Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Comparative Education, International Journal of Transgenderism, International Journal of Research & Method in Education, International Journal of Sexual Health and Asia-Pacific Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026