Comparative Education

1.6k papers and 28.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Comparative Education in the last decades have received a total of 28.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Comparative Education usually cover Education (1.0k papers), Political Science and International Relations (749 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (509 papers) specifically the topics of Global Educational Policies and Reforms (586 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (471 papers) and Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities (205 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comparative Education are Stephen J. Ball, Leon Tikly, Robert Cowen, Rosemary Deem, Paul Morris, George Psacharopoulos, Keita Takayama, Michael Crossley, Hannu Simola and David R. Phillips.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Comparative Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Comparative Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comparative Education.

Countries where authors publish in Comparative Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comparative Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comparative Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparative Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025