Li Ling

99 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

A research agenda for aging in China in the 21st century 2015 · 485 citations
4852015202620182022100200300400

Peers

Li Ling
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
  • Finance 657
  • Health 408
  • General Health Professions 915
  • Clinical Psychology 371
  • Biological Psychiatry 42
Replace Donglan Zhang with:
Donglan Zhang United States
Joseph L. Dieleman United States
Yuanli Liu China
Qunhong Wu China
Saharnaz Nedjat Iran
Tin Tin Su Malaysia
Pascale Allotey Malaysia
Tsung-Mei Cheng United States
Alexandra Martiniuk Australia
Siân Griffiths Hong Kong
Li Ling relative to Donglan Zhang United States Donglan Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Donglan Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li Ling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li Ling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li Ling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li Ling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li Ling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li Ling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li Ling. The network helps show where Li Ling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li Ling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li Ling Line = papers co-authored together Li Ling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A research agenda for aging in China in the 21st century
Hit paper breakdown →
2015485
2 2007326
3 2017183
4 202087
5 201881
6 200981
7 201479
8 202066
9 201661
10 201760
11 201453
12 200952
13 201749
14 201346
15 202144
16 201944
17 201644
18 202038
19 201937
20 202336

About Li Ling

Li Ling is a scholar working on Chemical Health and Safety, Finance, General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 112 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Systems and Reforms (15 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (15 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (13 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (10 papers), Global Health Care Issues (9 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (8 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (8 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (657 citations), Health (408 citations), General Health Professions (915 citations), Clinical Psychology (371 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (42 citations). Li Ling has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Hongqiao Fu, Wen Chen, Karen Eggleston, Qingyue Meng, Adam Wagstaff, Magnus Lindelöw, Victor R. Preedy, Juan Li, Tzi Bun Ng and Yuanli Liu. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychiatry and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact