Mark J. Lachowicz

16 papers receiving 630 citations

Peers

Mark J. Lachowicz
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Applied Psychology 26
  • Clinical Psychology 91
  • Statistics and Probability 28
  • Health 17
  • Social Psychology 36
Replace Timothy M. Osberg with:
Timothy M. Osberg United States
Akihito Kamata United States
Gerald G. Gaes United States
Sarah C. Nelson United States
Thomas P. Hogan United States
Stewart E. Cooper United States
Mark S. Aber United States
Jenn Yun Tein United States
Clement A. Stone United States
P. Priscilla Lui United States
Mark J. Lachowicz relative to Timothy M. Osberg United States Timothy M. Osberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14×
Timothy M. Osberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. Lachowicz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Lachowicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Lachowicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Lachowicz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. Lachowicz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Lachowicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Lachowicz. The network helps show where Mark J. Lachowicz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark J. Lachowicz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark J. Lachowicz Line = papers co-authored together Mark J. Lachowicz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2017207
2 2013103
3 2014102
4 201458
5 201444
6 201932
7 201429
8 202022
9 201616
10 201510
11 202210
12 20226
13 20194
14 20173
15 20232
16 20221
17 20250

About Mark J. Lachowicz

Mark J. Lachowicz is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability and Accounting, having authored 17 papers that have together received 649 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (1 paper), Early Childhood Education and Development (1 paper), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (1 paper), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (1 paper) and Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (26 citations), Clinical Psychology (91 citations), Statistics and Probability (28 citations), Health (17 citations) and Social Psychology (36 citations). Mark J. Lachowicz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Kristopher J. Preacher, Ken Kelley, Terence M. Keane, John A. Hermos, Eric Helmuth, Deborah J. Brief, Amy Rubin, David Rosenbloom, Justin L. Enggasser and Monica Roy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, Psychological Assessment, Family Relations, International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research and Addictive Behaviors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact