Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Easterby‐Smith
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Easterby‐Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Easterby‐Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Easterby‐Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Easterby‐Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Easterby‐Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Easterby‐Smith. The network helps show where Mark Easterby‐Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Easterby‐Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Easterby‐Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Easterby‐Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Easterby‐Smith. Mark Easterby‐Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Trehan, Kiran, et al.. (2013). Leadership Development as a Micro-foundation of Dynamic Capability: A Critical Consideration. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).1 indexed citations
Easterby‐Smith, Mark, et al.. (2012). The impact of the national culture on the interactive and collaborative approaches to knowledge management: an exploratory study.. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).1 indexed citations
6.
Easterby‐Smith, Mark, Richard Thorpe, & Paul R. Jackson. (2012). Management research : Mark Easterby-Smith, Richard Thorpe and Paul Jackson.29 indexed citations
Lervik, Jon Erland, et al.. (2007). Limits to Information Transfer: The Boundary Problem. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 1.2 indexed citations
Easterby‐Smith, Mark, et al.. (2003). Introduction: watersheds of organizational learning and knowledge management. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).94 indexed citations
15.
Easterby‐Smith, Mark. (1998). Organisational learning and national culture: do models of organisational learning apply outside the USA?. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 53(164). 281–295.11 indexed citations
16.
Easterby‐Smith, Mark. (1997). Disciplines of Organizational Learning: Contributions and Critiques. Human Relations. 50(9). 1085–1113.526 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Easterby‐Smith, Mark. (1997). Disciplines of organisational learning: contributions and critique. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).32 indexed citations
18.
Johns, A, Mark Easterby‐Smith, & John Burgoyne. (1997). Action learning: an evaluation. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).3 indexed citations
Usunier, Jean‐Claude, Mark Easterby‐Smith, & Richard Thorpe. (1993). Introduction à la recherche en gestion. IRIS.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.