Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations.
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Mertz
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Mertz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Mertz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Mertz more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Mertz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Mertz. The network helps show where Elizabeth Mertz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Mertz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Mertz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Mertz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Mertz. Elizabeth Mertz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Talesh, Shauhin A., Elizabeth Mertz, & Heinz Klug. (2021). Introduction — Modern Legal Realism: Paving the Way for Theoretically-Informed Empirical Research in the Legal Academy. eYLS (Yale Law School).1 indexed citations
2.
Mertz, Elizabeth & Bryant G. Garth. (2017). Introduction: New Legal Realism at Ten Years and Beyond. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
3.
Garth, Bryant G. & Elizabeth Mertz. (2016). Introduction: New Legal Realism at Ten Years and Beyond. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 6(2). 121.5 indexed citations
4.
Mertz, Elizabeth, Elizabeth Mertz, Michael W. McCann, et al.. (2016). The New Legal Realism. Cambridge University Press eBooks.12 indexed citations
5.
Mertz, Elizabeth. (2012). Undervaluing Indeterminacy: Translating Social Science into Law. The De Paul law review. 60(2). 397.4 indexed citations
Mertz, Elizabeth. (2010). The Role of Social Science in Law: Introduction. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
8.
Mertz, Elizabeth. (2008). The role of social science in law. Ashgate eBooks.3 indexed citations
9.
Mertz, Elizabeth. (2007). Inside the Law School Classroom: Toward a New Legal Realist Pedagogy. Vanderbilt law review. 60(2). 483.8 indexed citations
10.
Macaulay, Stewart, Lawrence M. Friedman, & Elizabeth Mertz. (2007). Law in Action: A Socio-Legal Reader. Medical Entomology and Zoology.16 indexed citations
11.
Erlanger, Howard S., et al.. (2006). Is it Time for a New Legal Realism. SSRN Electronic Journal.30 indexed citations
12.
Handler, Joel F., Orly Lobel, Elizabeth Mertz, et al.. (2005). A Roundtable on New Legal Realism, microanalysis of institutions, and the new governance: Exploring convergences and differences. 2005(2). 479–518.1 indexed citations
13.
Mertz, Elizabeth. (2000). Teaching Lawyers the Language of Law: Legal and Anthropological Translations, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 91 (2000). The John Marshall law review. 34(1). 5.
14.
Kinsey, Karyl A. & Elizabeth Mertz. (1999). Editors' Introduction. Law & Social Inquiry. 24(4). 925–925.
15.
Bowman, Cynthia Grant & Elizabeth Mertz. (1998). Attorneys as Gatekeepers to the Court: The Potential Liability of Attorneys Bringing Suits Based on Recovered Memories of Childhood Sexual Abuse. Hofstra law review. 27(2). 1.
16.
Mertz, Elizabeth, et al.. (1998). What Difference Does Difference Make? The Challenge for Legal Education.. Journal of legal education. 48(1). 1–87.8 indexed citations
17.
Bowman, Cynthia Grant & Elizabeth Mertz. (1996). What Should the Courts Do About Memories of Sexual Abuse? Toward a Balanced Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
18.
Mertz, Elizabeth. (1992). Creative Acts of Translation: James Boyd White's Intellectual Integration. Yale journal of law & the humanities. 4(1). 7.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.