Daniel P. Blakely
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Walter R. BootDaniel J. SimonsTimothy J. WrightNeil CharnessDustin J. SoudersMichael ChampionGabriel A. RadvanskyAndrea K. Tamplin
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers)Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers)Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Neuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Daniel P. Blakely
9 papers receiving 506 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 280
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 172
- Cognitive Neuroscience 166
- Education 68
- Artificial Intelligence 61
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel P. Blakely
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel P. Blakely's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel P. Blakely with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel P. Blakely more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel P. Blakely
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel P. Blakely. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel P. Blakely. The network helps show where Daniel P. Blakely may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel P. Blakely
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel P. Blakely. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel P. Blakely based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel P. Blakely. Daniel P. Blakely is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 132 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 335 | |
| 5 | 49 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2 |
About Daniel P. Blakely
Daniel P. Blakely is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Hardware and Architecture, having authored 9 papers that have together received 537 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (35 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (280 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (172 citations). Daniel P. Blakely has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Walter R. Boot, Daniel J. Simons, Timothy J. Wright, Neil Charness, Dustin J. Souders, Michael Champion, Gabriel A. Radvansky, Andrea K. Tamplin, James R. Brockmole and Jennifer Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Frontiers in Psychology and The American Journal of Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.