Jane M. Berry

1.4k total citations
36 papers, 942 citations indexed

About

Jane M. Berry is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane M. Berry has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 942 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 11 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 10 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Jane M. Berry's work include Aging and Gerontology Research (9 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (9 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers). Jane M. Berry is often cited by papers focused on Aging and Gerontology Research (9 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (9 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers). Jane M. Berry collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Jane M. Berry's co-authors include Robin L. West, Philip E. Tetlock, Randall S. Peterson, Iona Novak, Michael Strube, Paul J. Jurica, Arthur P. Shimamura, Cheryl L. Rusting, Jennifer A. Mangels and Frank C. Worrell and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Jane M. Berry

34 papers receiving 843 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jane M. Berry United States	14	256	241	207	199	184	36	942
Dolores Pushkar Canada	22	295 1.2×	305 1.3×	171 0.8×	342 1.7×	225 1.2×	38	1.4k
Steven W. Cornelius United States	14	309 1.2×	181 0.8×	134 0.6×	229 1.2×	171 0.9×	17	884
Nancy Wadsworth Denney United States	22	470 1.8×	223 0.9×	171 0.8×	284 1.4×	255 1.4×	64	1.4k
Richard W. Woodcock United States	13	441 1.7×	203 0.8×	163 0.8×	97 0.5×	143 0.8×	30	1.1k
Leslie D. Frazier United States	20	150 0.6×	97 0.4×	182 0.9×	366 1.8×	386 2.1×	41	1.2k
Gizem Hülür United States	20	251 1.0×	98 0.4×	178 0.9×	348 1.7×	223 1.2×	56	1.1k
Irene Ceccato Italy	17	230 0.9×	226 0.9×	91 0.4×	272 1.4×	312 1.7×	49	1.0k
John S. Carton United States	11	238 0.9×	257 1.1×	97 0.5×	267 1.3×	309 1.7×	14	819
Nora A. Murphy United States	19	458 1.8×	516 2.1×	97 0.5×	503 2.5×	263 1.4×	37	1.4k
Lina Pezzuti Italy	17	232 0.9×	161 0.7×	137 0.7×	173 0.9×	236 1.3×	58	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane M. Berry

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane M. Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane M. Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane M. Berry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane M. Berry

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane M. Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane M. Berry. The network helps show where Jane M. Berry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane M. Berry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane M. Berry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane M. Berry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane M. Berry. Jane M. Berry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Zakrzewski, Alexandria C., et al.. (2021). Evidence for Age-Equivalent and Task-Dissociative Metacognition in the Memory Domain. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 630143–630143. 11 indexed citations

2.

Zakrzewski, Alexandria C., Matthew G. Wisniewski, Helen Williams, & Jane M. Berry. (2019). Artificial neural networks reveal individual differences in metacognitive monitoring of memory. PLoS ONE. 14(7). e0220526–e0220526. 5 indexed citations

3.

Fox, Mark C., et al.. (2016). The role of encoding strategy in younger and older adult associative recognition: A think-aloud analysis.. Psychology and Aging. 31(5). 471–480. 8 indexed citations

4.

Berry, Jane M., et al.. (2015). Perceptions of Competence: Age Moderates Views of Healthy Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease. Experimental Aging Research. 41(2). 157–176. 5 indexed citations

5.

Fox, Mark C., et al.. (2014). Are vocabulary tests measurement invariant between age groups? An item response analysis of three popular tests.. Psychology and Aging. 29(4). 925–938. 6 indexed citations

6.

Novak, Iona & Jane M. Berry. (2014). Home Program Intervention Effectiveness Evidence. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics. 34(4). 384–389. 62 indexed citations

7.

Berry, Jane M., et al.. (2013). Metacognitive awareness of the associative deficit for words and names. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition. 20(5). 592–619. 9 indexed citations

8.

Cervone, Daniel, et al.. (2006). Self-Efficacy and Adult Development. 169. 14 indexed citations

9.

Berry, Jane M. & Jared B. Jobe. (2002). At the intersection of personality and adult development. Journal of Research in Personality. 36(4). 283–286. 4 indexed citations

10.

Berry, Jane M. & Susan Ryan. (2002). Frames of Reference: Their Use in Paediatric Occupational Therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 65(9). 420–427. 13 indexed citations

11.

Shimamura, Arthur P., Jane M. Berry, Jennifer A. Mangels, Cheryl L. Rusting, & Paul J. Jurica. (1995). MEMORY AND COGNITIVE ABILITIES IN UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS. 4 indexed citations

12.

Shimamura, Arthur P., Jane M. Berry, Jennifer A. Mangels, Cheryl L. Rusting, & Paul J. Jurica. (1995). Memory and Cognitive Abilities in University Professors: Evidence for Successful Aging. Psychological Science. 6(5). 271–277. 90 indexed citations

13.

Tetlock, Philip E., Randall S. Peterson, & Jane M. Berry. (1993). Flattering and unflattering personality portraits of integratively simple and complex managers.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 64(3). 500–511. 104 indexed citations

14.

Tetlock, Philip E., Randall S. Peterson, & Jane M. Berry. (1993). Flattering and unflattering personality portraits of integratively simple and complex managers.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 64(3). 500–511. 8 indexed citations

15.

Berry, Jane M.. (1989). Cognitive efficacy across the life span: Introduction to the special series.. Developmental Psychology. 25(5). 683–686. 1 indexed citations

16.

Coyne, Andrew C., et al.. (1987). Adult Age, Information Processing, and Partial Report Performance. The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 148(2). 219–224. 6 indexed citations

17.

Strube, Michael, et al.. (1986). Self-schematic representation of the Type A and B behavior patterns.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51(1). 170–180. 18 indexed citations

18.

Strube, Michael, et al.. (1985). Relinquishment of control and the Type A behavior pattern: The role of performance evaluation.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 49(3). 831–842. 12 indexed citations

19.

Strube, Michael, et al.. (1985). Type A behavior, age, and psychological well-being.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 49(1). 203–218. 18 indexed citations

20.

Berry, Jane M., et al.. (1975). A Critical Look at the Queen Bee Syndrome..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact