Mark Attridge

36 papers receiving 701 citations

Peers

Mark Attridge
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 237
  • Social Psychology 266
  • Applied Psychology 64
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 24
  • Clinical Psychology 209
Replace Lorenzo Avanzi with:
Lorenzo Avanzi Italy
Coralia Șulea Romania
Thomas Staufenbiel Germany
Pascale Desrumaux France
Véronique Dagenais‐Desmarais Canada
Yisheng Peng United States
Kerry Lewig Australia
Felipe Valentini Brazil
KangHyun Shin South Korea
Joan E. van Horn Netherlands
Mark Attridge relative to Lorenzo Avanzi Italy Lorenzo Avanzi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Lorenzo Avanzi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Attridge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Attridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Attridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Attridge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Attridge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Attridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Attridge. The network helps show where Mark Attridge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Attridge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Attridge Line = papers co-authored together Mark Attridge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009272
2 199591
3 201483
4 201959
5 201344
6 199941
7 199824
8 201623
9 201316
10 200516
11 201016
12 202014
13 202110
14 201610
15 201110
16 20209
17 20118
18 20208
19 20218
20
EAP Effectiveness and ROI
20098

About Mark Attridge

Mark Attridge is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Applied Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 828 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Health and Well-being (20 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (7 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (6 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (237 citations), Social Psychology (266 citations), Applied Psychology (64 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (24 citations) and Clinical Psychology (209 citations). Mark Attridge has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Berscheid, Jeffry A. Simpson, Lonnie Zwaigenbaum, Margaret Clarke, David Nicholas, Patricia Herlihy, Susan Sprecher, JianLi Wang, Bonnie Lashewicz and Alain Marchand. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Professional Psychology Research and Practice and American Journal of Health Promotion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact