Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
What is beautiful is good.
19722.7k citationsEllen Berscheid, Elaine Walster et al.Journal of Personality and Social Psychologyprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Berscheid
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Berscheid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Berscheid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Berscheid more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Berscheid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Berscheid. The network helps show where Ellen Berscheid may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ellen Berscheid
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ellen Berscheid.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ellen Berscheid based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ellen Berscheid. Ellen Berscheid is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Frederick, David A., George W. Bohrnstedt, Elaine Hatfield, & Ellen Berscheid. (2014). Factor Structure and Validity of the Body Parts Satisfaction Scale: Results from the 1972 Psychology Today Survey. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.21 indexed citations
Berscheid, Ellen & W. Andrew Collins. (2000). Who cares? For whom and when, how, and why?. Psychological Inquiry. 11. 107–109.4 indexed citations
4.
Reis, Harry T., W. Andrew Collins, & Ellen Berscheid. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development.. Psychological Bulletin. 126(6). 844–872.554 indexed citations breakdown →
Berscheid, Ellen. (1991). The emotion-in-relationships model: Reflections and update..15 indexed citations
12.
Berscheid, Ellen. (1990). Contemporary vocabularies of emotion..7 indexed citations
13.
Berscheid, Ellen. (1985). Interpersonal Modes of Knowing. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 86(6). 60–76.3 indexed citations
Hatfield, Elaine, G. William Walster, Ellen Berscheid, et al.. (1978). Equity : theory and research. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1726 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Snyder, Mark, Elizabeth Decker Tanke, & Ellen Berscheid. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 35(9). 656–666.850 indexed citations breakdown →
Walster, Elaine, Ellen Berscheid, & G. William Walster. (1973). New directions in equity research.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 25(2). 151–176.1201 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.