Mark A. Mone

2.7k total citations
36 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

Mark A. Mone is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark A. Mone has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 6 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Mark A. Mone's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (12 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (7 papers) and Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring (7 papers). Mark A. Mone is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (12 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (7 papers) and Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring (7 papers). Mark A. Mone collaborates with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Mark A. Mone's co-authors include Vincent L. Barker, William McKinley, Bonnie S. O’Neill, Gyewan Moon, Douglas D. Baker, George C. Mueller, Christina E. Shalley, Sunghoon Kim, Seongsu Kim and Padmal Vitharana and has published in prestigious journals such as Academy of Management Review, Strategic Management Journal and Journal of Applied Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Mark A. Mone

36 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark A. Mone United States 21 894 492 379 225 214 36 1.9k
Robert L. Heneman United States 18 838 0.9× 239 0.5× 198 0.5× 262 1.2× 220 1.0× 46 1.6k
Lloyd Baird United States 14 693 0.8× 523 1.1× 192 0.5× 195 0.9× 170 0.8× 30 1.5k
W. Harvey Hegarty United States 20 715 0.8× 869 1.8× 332 0.9× 465 2.1× 170 0.8× 37 2.4k
Nanette Fondas United States 10 845 0.9× 533 1.1× 172 0.5× 252 1.1× 137 0.6× 19 1.7k
Timothy M. Gardner United States 16 1.6k 1.8× 724 1.5× 359 0.9× 336 1.5× 249 1.2× 25 2.5k
Paul Iles United Kingdom 27 1.9k 2.1× 544 1.1× 508 1.3× 405 1.8× 392 1.8× 71 3.1k
James D. Werbel United States 26 1.2k 1.3× 385 0.8× 360 0.9× 559 2.5× 419 2.0× 53 2.3k
Christine S. Koberg United States 18 771 0.9× 554 1.1× 169 0.4× 361 1.6× 450 2.1× 37 2.0k
Edward J. Conlon United States 18 555 0.6× 395 0.8× 190 0.5× 316 1.4× 153 0.7× 35 1.6k
Richard W. Beatty United States 16 1.1k 1.2× 425 0.9× 179 0.5× 209 0.9× 308 1.4× 47 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Mone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Mone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Mone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Mone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Mone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Mone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Mone. The network helps show where Mark A. Mone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark A. Mone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark A. Mone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark A. Mone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark A. Mone. Mark A. Mone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kim, Seongsu, Mark A. Mone, & Sunghoon Kim. (2008). Relationships Among Self-Efficacy, Pay-for-Performance Perceptions, and Pay Satisfaction: A Korean Examination. Human Performance. 21(2). 158–179. 30 indexed citations
2.
O’Neill, Bonnie S. & Mark A. Mone. (2005). Psychological Influences on Referent Choice. Journal of managerial issues. 17(3). 273. 11 indexed citations
3.
McKinley, William, Mark A. Mone, & Gyewan Moon. (2003). DETERMINANTES E DESENVOLVIMENTO DE ESCOLAS NA TEORIA ORGANIZACIONAL. Revista de Administração de Empresas. 43(3). 85–99. 1 indexed citations
4.
Mone, Mark A.. (2003). Book Reviews. Administrative Science Quarterly. 48(4). 705–709. 1 indexed citations
5.
Kochar, Mahendr S., et al.. (2003). A faculty leadership development program at the Medical College of Wisconsin.. PubMed. 102(2). 24–8. 8 indexed citations
6.
Mone, Mark A.. (2002). Book Reviews. Administrative Science Quarterly. 47(3). 591–594. 50 indexed citations
7.
Mone, Mark A., et al.. (2000). Information technology project outcomes: user participation structures and the impact of organization behavior and human resource management issues. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 17(2). 127–151. 21 indexed citations
8.
McKinley, William, Mark A. Mone, & Vincent L. Barker. (1998). Organizational Decline and Innovation. Academy of Management Review. 23. 19 indexed citations
9.
Barker, Vincent L. & Mark A. Mone. (1998). The Mechanistic Structure Shift and Strategic Reorientation in Declining Firms Attempting Turnarounds. Human Relations. 51(10). 1227–1258. 87 indexed citations
10.
O’Neill, Bonnie S. & Mark A. Mone. (1998). Investigating equity sensitivity as a moderator of relations between self-efficacy and workplace attitudes.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 83(5). 805–816. 4 indexed citations
11.
Mone, Mark A., William McKinley, & Vincent L. Barker. (1998). Organizational Decline and Innovation: A Contingency Framework. Academy of Management Review. 23(1). 115–132. 347 indexed citations
12.
McKinley, William, Mark A. Mone, & Vincent L. Barker. (1998). Some Ideological Foundations of Organizational Downsizing. Journal of Management Inquiry. 7(3). 198–212. 78 indexed citations
13.
Mone, Mark A.. (1997). How We Got along after the Downsizing: Post-Downsizing Trust as a Double-Edged Sword. Public Administration Quarterly. 21(3). 309. 39 indexed citations
14.
Barker, Vincent L. & Mark A. Mone. (1994). Retrenchment: Cause of turnaround or consequence of decline?. Strategic Management Journal. 15(5). 395–405. 156 indexed citations
15.
Mone, Mark A.. (1994). Comparative Validity of Two Measures of Self-Efficacy in Predicting Academic Goals and Performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 54(2). 516–529. 46 indexed citations
16.
Mone, Mark A.. (1994). Relationships between self‐concepts, aspirations, emotional responses, and intent to leave a downsizing organization. Human Resource Management. 33(2). 281–298. 89 indexed citations
17.
Mone, Mark A. & William McKinley. (1993). The Uniqueness Value and its Consequences for Organization Studies. Journal of Management Inquiry. 2(3). 284–296. 90 indexed citations
18.
Mone, Mark A. & Douglas D. Baker. (1992). Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Determinants and Consequences of Self-Set Goals: An Integrative, Dynamic Model. Human Performance. 5(3). 213–234. 9 indexed citations
19.
Mone, Mark A. & Douglas D. Baker. (1992). A social-cognitive, attributional model of personal goals: An empirical evaluation. Motivation and Emotion. 16(4). 297–321. 27 indexed citations
20.
Mone, Mark A. & Douglas D. Baker. (1989). Stage of Task Learning as a Moderator of the Goal-Performance Relationship. Human Performance. 2(2). 85–99. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026