Margaret Brooks
- Education top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Topics
- Education and Technology Integration (5 papers)Digital Storytelling and Education (3 papers)Art Education and Development (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
Margaret Brooks
12 papers receiving 243 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Education 178
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 80
- Social Psychology 42
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 40
- Sociology and Political Science 39
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Brooks
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Brooks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Brooks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Brooks. The network helps show where Margaret Brooks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Brooks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Brooks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Brooks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Brooks. Margaret Brooks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flawed Analysis of Prostitution in Rhode Island | 1 |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | Introducing the Project Approach and Use of Visual Representation to Early Childhood Education in Bhutan. | 5 |
| 4 | The impact of Aboriginal English (or Torres Strait Creole) on learning outcomes for Indigenous children in ACT preschools and preschool programs | 1 |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | The Excellent Inevitability of Online Courses. | 8 |
| 7 | What Vygotsky can teach us about young children drawing | 17 |
| 8 | 133 | |
| 9 | 49 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | Drawing, thinking, meaning | 1 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 0 |
About Margaret Brooks
Margaret Brooks is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Speech and Hearing, having authored 14 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education and Technology Integration (5 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (3 papers) and Art Education and Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (40 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (80 citations) and Education (178 citations). Margaret Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Helen Edwards, David A. Schulz, Donna M. Hughes and Elizabeth Ellis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Marriage and the Family, International Journal of Science Education and Physiotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.