Marco de Haas

483 total citations
8 papers, 308 citations indexed

About

Marco de Haas is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Marco de Haas has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 308 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Marco de Haas's work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (4 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers) and Cognitive Science and Mapping (2 papers). Marco de Haas is often cited by papers focused on Complex Systems and Decision Making (4 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers) and Cognitive Science and Mapping (2 papers). Marco de Haas collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Türkiye. Marco de Haas's co-authors include Ad Kleingeld, Murat Tarakci, Patrick J. F. Groenen, Nüfer Yasin Ateş, Jeanine Pieternel Porck, Daan van Knippenberg, Jacqueline J. Meulman and Alexander Benlian and has published in prestigious journals such as Strategic Management Journal, Journal of Management and Management Accounting Research.

In The Last Decade

Marco de Haas

8 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Marco de Haas Netherlands	6	157	124	94	51	43	8	308
Hong Seng Woo United Kingdom	9	235 1.5×	132 1.1×	50 0.5×	31 0.6×	52 1.2×	12	416
Louise Côté Canada	7	142 0.9×	164 1.3×	77 0.8×	154 3.0×	40 0.9×	9	356
David Emsley Australia	9	225 1.4×	113 0.9×	82 0.9×	131 2.6×	23 0.5×	14	337
Sharon M. McKinnon United States	8	175 1.1×	112 0.9×	51 0.5×	119 2.3×	32 0.7×	13	323
Klaus Derfuß Germany	7	122 0.8×	90 0.7×	180 1.9×	64 1.3×	18 0.4×	9	378
Andrea Drake United States	7	139 0.9×	74 0.6×	62 0.7×	102 2.0×	44 1.0×	14	294
Noor Mohamad Malaysia	10	68 0.4×	105 0.8×	125 1.3×	39 0.8×	78 1.8×	22	358
Katsuki Aoki Japan	9	154 1.0×	211 1.7×	56 0.6×	13 0.3×	38 0.9×	20	349
Davis Dyer	7	66 0.4×	200 1.6×	108 1.1×	29 0.6×	69 1.6×	11	409
Bertie M. Greer United States	10	157 1.0×	184 1.5×	98 1.0×	19 0.4×	22 0.5×	17	341

Countries citing papers authored by Marco de Haas

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marco de Haas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marco de Haas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marco de Haas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marco de Haas

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marco de Haas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marco de Haas. The network helps show where Marco de Haas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marco de Haas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marco de Haas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marco de Haas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marco de Haas. Marco de Haas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Haas, Marco de, et al.. (2024). Building Metaknowledge in AI Literacy – The Effect of Gamified vs. Text-based Learning on AI Literacy Metaknowledge. Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 3 indexed citations

2.

Porck, Jeanine Pieternel, Daan van Knippenberg, Murat Tarakci, et al.. (2018). Do Group and Organizational Identification Help or Hurt Intergroup Strategic Consensus?. Journal of Management. 46(2). 234–260. 43 indexed citations

3.

Tarakci, Murat, Nüfer Yasin Ateş, Jeanine Pieternel Porck, et al.. (2013). Strategic consensus mapping: A new method for testing and visualizing strategic consensus within and between teams. Strategic Management Journal. 35(7). 1053–1069. 51 indexed citations

4.

Haas, Marco de, et al.. (2002). Demonstrating the effect of the strategic dialogue: participation in designing the management control system. Management Accounting Research. 13(1). 41–69. 24 indexed citations

5.

Haas, Marco de, et al.. (2000). Macro and Micro Goal Setting: In Search of Coherence. Applied Psychology. 49(3). 579–595. 15 indexed citations

6.

Haas, Marco de & Ad Kleingeld. (1999). Multilevel Design of Performance Measurement Systems: Enhancing Strategic Dialogue Throughout the Organization. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations

7.

Haas, Marco de & Ad Kleingeld. (1999). Multilevel design of performance measurement systems: enhancing strategic dialogue throughout the organization. Management Accounting Research. 10(3). 233–261. 146 indexed citations

8.

Haas, Marco de, et al.. (1998). The knowledge matrix: a participatory method for individual knowledge gap determination. Knowledge and Process Management. 5(4). 255–263. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact