This map shows the geographic impact of Luís Araújo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luís Araújo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luís Araújo more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luís Araújo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luís Araújo. The network helps show where Luís Araújo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luís Araújo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luís Araújo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luís Araújo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Luís Araújo. Luís Araújo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Araújo, Luís, et al.. (2016). Evaluating learning disability case management from a service delivery network perspective. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 367–386.1 indexed citations
4.
Araújo, Luís, Katy Mason, & Martin Spring. (2014). Expectations in networks : market shaping devices of the driverless car. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).3 indexed citations
Dubois, Anna & Luís Araújo. (2006). The Relationship between Technical and Organisational Interfaces in Product Development. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 1(1). 28–51.37 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.