Brian Rabern

656 citations
27 papers · 333 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Brian Rabern

25 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

Brian Rabern
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 222
  • History and Philosophy of Science 72
  • Philosophy 169
  • Language and Linguistics 105
  • Artificial Intelligence 125
Replace Dilip Ninan with:
Dilip Ninan United States
Joseph Almog
Josh Dever United States
Delia Graff United States
Justin Khoo United States
Malte Willer United States
John Oliver Perry
Thomas J. McKay United States
Paolo Santorio United States
Michael Glanzberg United States
Brian Rabern relative to Dilip Ninan United States Dilip Ninan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dilip Ninan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Rabern

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Rabern's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Rabern with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Rabern more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Rabern

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Rabern. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Rabern. The network helps show where Brian Rabern may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Brian Rabern, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Rabern Line = papers co-authored together Brian Rabern links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201266
2 201554
3
Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21
201839
4 201239
5 201214
6 201511
7 201411
8 201611
9 201610
10 201710
11 20199
12 20179
13 20227
14 20087
15
David Lewis’s Metaphysics
20107
16 20206
17 20126
18
The Science of Meaning: Essays on the Metatheory of Natural Language Semantics
20184
19 20163
20 20183

About Brian Rabern

Brian Rabern is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (15 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (10 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (3 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (3 papers) and Free Will and Agency (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (222 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (72 citations), Philosophy (169 citations), Language and Linguistics (105 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (125 citations). Brian Rabern has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Todd, Christopher C. Cummins, Caroline Heycock, Robert Truswell, Hannah Rohde, Derek Ball, David J. Chalmers, Matthew Macauley, Wolfgang Schwarz and Ned Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Philosophical Logic, Analysis, Philosophical Studies, Thought A Journal of Philosophy and Linguistics and Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact