Josh Dever
- Philosophy top 2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 7
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 2
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 10
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 2
- Language and Linguistics top 10%
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation 1
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 4
-
- Neural dynamics and brain function 1
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorwayFrance
In The Last Decade
Josh Dever
19 papers receiving 265 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Philosophy 161
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 174
- History and Philosophy of Science 56
- Language and Linguistics 46
- Health Informatics 5
Countries citing papers authored by Josh Dever
This map shows the geographic impact of Josh Dever's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Josh Dever with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Josh Dever more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Josh Dever
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Josh Dever. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Josh Dever. The network helps show where Josh Dever may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Josh Dever, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 35 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 3 | Puzzles of Reference | 2018 | 1 |
| 4 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 5 | Context and Communication | 2016 | 2 |
| 6 | Three Modes of, And Five Morals Regarding, Displaced Semantic Processing, With Special Attention to the Role of Variables (And a Final Plug for Dynamic Semantics) | 2015 | 0 |
| 7 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 41 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 84 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 13 | The Two Envelope Paradox and Using Variables Within the Expectation Formula | 2008 | 2 |
| 14 | 2007 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 32 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 15 |
About Josh Dever
Josh Dever is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence and Safety Research, having authored 20 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (1 paper) and Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (161 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (174 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (56 citations), Language and Linguistics (46 citations) and Health Informatics (5 citations). Josh Dever has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and France. Frequent co-authors include Herman Cappelen, Daniel Bonevac, David Sosa, D. Sosa and Nicholas Asher. Their work appears in journals such as Inquiry, Mind, The Philosophical Review, Linguistics and Philosophy and Noûs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.