Li‐Ming Chen

38 papers receiving 927 citations

Peers

Li‐Ming Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Social Psychology 434
  • Safety Research 88
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 87
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 103
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 11
Replace Phillip Kaufman with:
Phillip Kaufman United States
William L. Holahan United States
Stephen Boyd United States
Tamás Martos Hungary
Michael R. Thomsen United States
Sonia Salvo-Garrido Chile
Pepita Barlow United Kingdom
Ya Wen China
İmran Aslan Türkiye
Li‐Ming Chen relative to Phillip Kaufman United States Phillip Kaufman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Phillip Kaufman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li‐Ming Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li‐Ming Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li‐Ming Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li‐Ming Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li‐Ming Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li‐Ming Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li‐Ming Chen. The network helps show where Li‐Ming Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li‐Ming Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li‐Ming Chen Line = papers co-authored together Li‐Ming Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019139
2 2004116
3 2002103
4 201168
5 202051
6 201040
7 201139
8 201633
9 201931
10 201330
11 201328
12 201625
13 201921
14 200121
15 201319
16 201818
17 200218
18 201817
19 201616
20 201514

About Li‐Ming Chen

Li‐Ming Chen is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Plant Science and Insect Science, having authored 40 papers that have together received 970 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (23 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (16 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (6 papers), Education Discipline and Inequality (5 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (5 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (434 citations), Safety Research (88 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (87 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (103 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (11 citations). Li‐Ming Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Belgium and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Ying‐Yao Cheng, Zin-Huang Liu, Ziqing Du, Zhihao Hu, Ji‐Kang Chen, Chih-Cheng Lin, Yun‐An Chen, Wen Cheng, Lennon Y. C. Chang and Yi‐Ling Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Psychology, School Psychology International, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, Journal of School Violence and Journal of Plant Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact