Leonard Lynn

1.3k citations
53 papers · 789 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Leonard Lynn

51 papers receiving 659 citations

Peers

Leonard Lynn
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Strategy and Management 394
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 163
  • Business and International Management 43
  • Economics and Econometrics 227
  • Computer Science Applications 42
Replace Leif Hommen with:
Leif Hommen Sweden
Mark Lehrer United States
Kenneth Guang-Lih Huang Singapore
Keith Dickson United Kingdom
Kurt Hoffman United Kingdom
Peter Kesting Denmark
Refik Culpan United States
Catherine Banbury United States
Xavier Castañer Switzerland
John Finch United Kingdom
Leonard Lynn relative to Leif Hommen Sweden Leif Hommen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Leif Hommen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leonard Lynn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leonard Lynn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leonard Lynn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leonard Lynn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leonard Lynn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leonard Lynn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leonard Lynn. The network helps show where Leonard Lynn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Leonard Lynn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leonard Lynn Line = papers co-authored together Leonard Lynn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996217
2 198992
3 200076
4 198339
5 199330
6 200228
7 199728
8 199127
9 200223
10 199019
11 199516
12 199216
13 200014
14 199914
15 200912
16 199812
17 200710
18 20129
19 20068
20 19827

About Leonard Lynn

Leonard Lynn is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations and Business and International Management, having authored 53 papers that have together received 789 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (11 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (5 papers), University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (4 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (4 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (3 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (3 papers), Asian Industrial and Economic Development (2 papers) and Research, Science, and Academia (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (394 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (163 citations), Business and International Management (43 citations), Economics and Econometrics (227 citations) and Computer Science Applications (42 citations). Leonard Lynn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include N. Mohan Reddy, John D. Aram, David S. Friedman, Hal Salzman, Akira Gotō, H. R. Piehler, Hayagreeva Rao, Udo Staber, Timothy J. McKeown and Glenn D. Hook. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Japanese Studies, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Pacific Affairs and Asian Business & Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact