Lene Buhelt Johansen
- Food Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics
- Co-authors
- Lotte Bach LarsenValentin RauhMarianne HammershøjMarie PaulssonNina Aagaard PoulsenRichard IpsenMette BakmanThomas Skov
- Topics
- Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows (11 papers)Probiotics and Fermented Foods (8 papers)Proteins in Food Systems (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryJournal of Dairy Science
- Partner nations
- DenmarkSwedenUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Lene Buhelt Johansen
16 papers receiving 388 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Food Science 257
- Molecular Biology 176
- Animal Science and Zoology 93
- Agronomy and Crop Science 83
- Nutrition and Dietetics 65
Countries citing papers authored by Lene Buhelt Johansen
This map shows the geographic impact of Lene Buhelt Johansen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lene Buhelt Johansen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lene Buhelt Johansen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lene Buhelt Johansen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lene Buhelt Johansen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lene Buhelt Johansen. The network helps show where Lene Buhelt Johansen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lene Buhelt Johansen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lene Buhelt Johansen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lene Buhelt Johansen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lene Buhelt Johansen. Lene Buhelt Johansen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 51 | |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | 71 | |
| 16 | 14 |
About Lene Buhelt Johansen
Lene Buhelt Johansen is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Food Science and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows (11 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (8 papers) and Proteins in Food Systems (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (257 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (93 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (83 citations). Lene Buhelt Johansen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lotte Bach Larsen, Valentin Rauh, Marianne Hammershøj, Marie Paulsson, Nina Aagaard Poulsen, Richard Ipsen, Mette Bakman, Thomas Skov, Maria Glantz and Mette Christensen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Journal of Dairy Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.