Lauren K. Wright

1.3k total citations
10 papers, 818 citations indexed

About

Lauren K. Wright is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lauren K. Wright has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 818 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 3 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Lauren K. Wright's work include Management and Marketing Education (4 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers) and Accounting Education and Careers (2 papers). Lauren K. Wright is often cited by papers focused on Management and Marketing Education (4 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers) and Accounting Education and Careers (2 papers). Lauren K. Wright collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Kazakhstan. Lauren K. Wright's co-authors include Christopher Lovelock, Karina Hoffmann, Dwayne D. Gremler, Susan M. Keaveney, Mary Jo Bitner, Valarie A. Zeithaml, Daniel R. Toy, Matthew L. Meuter, Kenneth J. Chapman and Lorraine R. Gardiner and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Marketing Education, Thunderbird International Business Review and Marketing Science Institute eBooks.

In The Last Decade

Lauren K. Wright

10 papers receiving 672 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lauren K. Wright United States 8 307 278 273 172 153 10 818
Denny E. McCorkle United States 16 151 0.5× 304 1.1× 342 1.3× 218 1.3× 175 1.1× 30 883
Abhijit Roy United States 18 186 0.6× 118 0.4× 342 1.3× 111 0.6× 296 1.9× 46 889
Gopala Ganesh United States 15 277 0.9× 116 0.4× 358 1.3× 94 0.5× 249 1.6× 34 775
Dana Egerová Czechia 10 255 0.8× 466 1.7× 258 0.9× 241 1.4× 194 1.3× 28 1.1k
Nancy M. Levenburg United States 19 464 1.5× 444 1.6× 89 0.3× 87 0.5× 213 1.4× 35 1.1k
Lynn E. Metcalf United States 16 238 0.8× 161 0.6× 167 0.6× 93 0.5× 143 0.9× 26 857
Christopher T. Street Canada 6 336 1.1× 238 0.9× 85 0.3× 52 0.3× 111 0.7× 8 866
K C Patrick Low Australia 14 179 0.6× 97 0.3× 80 0.3× 72 0.4× 221 1.4× 152 794
Can Uslay United States 16 262 0.9× 345 1.2× 379 1.4× 36 0.2× 235 1.5× 46 1.0k
Robert P. Bush United States 12 274 0.9× 70 0.3× 262 1.0× 72 0.4× 261 1.7× 17 829

Countries citing papers authored by Lauren K. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lauren K. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lauren K. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lauren K. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lauren K. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lauren K. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lauren K. Wright. The network helps show where Lauren K. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lauren K. Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lauren K. Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lauren K. Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lauren K. Wright. Lauren K. Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Singh, Nitish, Daniel R. Toy, & Lauren K. Wright. (2009). A diagnostic framework for measuring Web‐site localization. Thunderbird International Business Review. 51(3). 281–295. 24 indexed citations
2.
Meuter, Matthew L., et al.. (2009). Reducing Content Variance and Improving Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Marketing Education. 31(2). 109–119. 7 indexed citations
3.
Chapman, Kenneth J., Matthew L. Meuter, Daniel R. Toy, & Lauren K. Wright. (2009). Are Student Groups Dysfunctional?. Journal of Marketing Education. 32(1). 39–49. 55 indexed citations
4.
Lovelock, Christopher & Lauren K. Wright. (2005). Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa. 40 indexed citations
5.
Corbitt, Gail, Lorraine R. Gardiner, & Lauren K. Wright. (2004). A comparison of team developmental stages, trust and performance for virtual versus face-to-face teams. 4. 8 pp.–8 pp.. 30 indexed citations
6.
Gremler, Dwayne D., Karina Hoffmann, Susan M. Keaveney, & Lauren K. Wright. (2000). Experiential Learning Exercises in Services Marketing Courses. Journal of Marketing Education. 22(1). 35–44. 149 indexed citations
7.
Lovelock, Christopher & Lauren K. Wright. (1999). Principles of service marketing and management. 407 indexed citations
8.
Wright, Lauren K., Mary Jo Bitner, & Valarie A. Zeithaml. (1994). Paradigm Shifts in Business Education: Using Active Learning to Deliver Services Marketing Content. Journal of Marketing Education. 16(3). 5–19. 103 indexed citations
9.
Wright, Lauren K.. (1990). Characterizing successful new business services. UMI eBooks. 1 indexed citations
10.
Wright, Lauren K.. (1987). Competing in a deregulated or volatile market. Marketing Science Institute eBooks. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026