Thunderbird International Business Review

23.9k citations
1.3k papers · · active since 1960

Impact in

    • International Business and FDI
    • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
    • Innovation and Knowledge Management
    • International Student and Expatriate Challenges

Papers in

Thunderbird International Business Review

1.0k papers receiving 18.6k citations

Peers

Thunderbird International Business Review
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Strategy and Management 6.9k
  • Communication 1.8k
  • Business and International Management 170
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 949
  • Accounting 1.7k
Replace Management International Review with:
Management International Review United Kingdom
Journal of International Management United States
International Studies of Management and Organization United Kingdom
Journal of Business Strategy United States
Journal of Management Development United States
Management Research Review United States
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management India
Asia Pacific Journal of Management China
Scandinavian Journal of Management Sweden
Organizational Dynamics United States
Thunderbird International Business Review relative to Management International Review United Kingdom Management International Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Management International Review · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Thunderbird International Business Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Thunderbird International Business Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Thunderbird International Business Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thunderbird International Business Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Thunderbird International Business Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Thunderbird International Business Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Thunderbird International Business Review.

About Thunderbird International Business Review

The 1.3k papers published in Thunderbird International Business Review in the last decades have received a total of 23.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Thunderbird International Business Review usually cover Strategy and Management (507 papers), Business and International Management (16 papers), Communication (65 papers), Accounting (88 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (64 papers) specifically the topics of International Business and FDI (413 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (61 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (46 papers), Global and Cross-Cultural Management (41 papers), Human Resource and Talent Management (28 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (23 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (21 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Thunderbird International Business Review are Vanessa Ratten, Pawan S Budhwar, Vesa Suutari, Chris J. Brewster, Felicitas Pietrulla, Sylvie Geisendorf, Mark Esposito, Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah, Jaime Bonache and Cliff Wymbs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact