Ken Gilhooly
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Robert H. LogieLouise H. PhillipsLiz SmithPriscilla HarriesDavid PearsonAnne WalkerGeorge GeorgiouVikki Entwistle
- Topics
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (4 papers)Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers)Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers)
- Cited by
- General Decision SciencesNeuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyExperimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaEmotionPatient Education and Counseling
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIsrael
In The Last Decade
Ken Gilhooly
21 papers receiving 477 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Cognitive Neuroscience 153
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 143
- General Health Professions 107
- Social Psychology 78
- Clinical Psychology 52
Countries citing papers authored by Ken Gilhooly
This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Gilhooly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Gilhooly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Gilhooly more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Gilhooly
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Gilhooly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Gilhooly. The network helps show where Ken Gilhooly may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ken Gilhooly
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ken Gilhooly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ken Gilhooly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ken Gilhooly. Ken Gilhooly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 47 | |
| 8 | Verbalisation and working memory aid effects on insight and non-insight problem solving | 1 |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | Clinical guidelines of depression: a qualitative study of GPs' views. | 27 |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 82 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 87 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Ken Gilhooly
Ken Gilhooly is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 522 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (4 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (38 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (19 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (143 citations). Ken Gilhooly has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Robert H. Logie, Louise H. Phillips, Liz Smith, Priscilla Harries, David Pearson, Anne Walker, George Georgiou, Vikki Entwistle, Carol Bugge and Neva E. Haites. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Emotion and Patient Education and Counseling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.