Dan Zakay

8.9k total citations · 2 hit papers
86 papers, 5.7k citations indexed

About

Dan Zakay is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Dan Zakay has authored 86 papers receiving a total of 5.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 28 papers in General Decision Sciences and 24 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Dan Zakay's work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (31 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (28 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (16 papers). Dan Zakay is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Music Perception (31 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (28 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (16 papers). Dan Zakay collaborates with scholars based in Israel, United States and Canada. Dan Zakay's co-authors include Richard A. Block, Peter A. Hancock, Dan Ariely, Joseph Glicksohn, Yehoshua Tsal, Dorit Nitzan, Yair Bar‐Haim, Dominique Lamy, Marius Usher and Shahar Ayal and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and Current Directions in Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Dan Zakay

83 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Decision making in action: Models and methods

1994 1.1k citations Dan Zakay Acta Psychologica profile →
Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review

1997 508 citations Richard A. Block, Dan Zakay Psychonomic Bulletin & Review profile →

Peers

Dan Zakay

CN

ECP

SP

GDS

SP

Peter Sedlmeier Germany

Richard A. Block United States

Daniel Västfjäll Sweden

Gordon D. A. Brown United Kingdom

Fernand Gobet United Kingdom

Lazar Stankov Australia

David Z. Hambrick United States

Niels Taatgen Netherlands

William G. Chase United States

Michael A. Wallach United States

Peter Sedlmeier Germany

Dan Zakay

1.5k ×0.5

CN

1.2k ×0.7

ECP

1.3k ×1.0

SP

407 ×0.6

GDS

463 ×0.9

SP

Citations per year, relative to Dan Zakay Dan Zakay (= 1×) peers Peter Sedlmeier

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Zakay

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Zakay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Zakay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Zakay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Zakay

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Zakay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Zakay. The network helps show where Dan Zakay may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dan Zakay

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dan Zakay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dan Zakay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dan Zakay. Dan Zakay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Block, Richard A., Peter A. Hancock, & Dan Zakay. (2016). Physical load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Acta Psychologica. 165. 43–47. 18 indexed citations

2.

Zakay, Dan. (2015). The temporal-relevance temporal-uncertainty model of prospective duration judgment. Consciousness and Cognition. 38. 182–190. 23 indexed citations

3.

Zakay, Dan, et al.. (2015). Foreperiod and range effects on time interval categorization. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 77(5). 1507–1514. 7 indexed citations

4.

Mioni, Giovanna, Dan Zakay, & Simon Grondin. (2015). Faster is briefer: The symbolic meaning of speed influences time perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 22(5). 1285–1291. 21 indexed citations

5.

Zakay, Dan, et al.. (2013). Pitting intuitive and analytical thinking against each other: The case of transitivity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 20(3). 608–614. 37 indexed citations

6.

Kreitler, Shulamith, Phillip L. Ackerman, Jerome S. Bruner, et al.. (2012). Cognition and Motivation. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations

7.

Ayal, Shahar, Guy Hochman, & Dan Zakay. (2011). Two sides of the same coin: Information processing style and reverse biases. Judgment and Decision Making. 6(4). 295–305. 22 indexed citations

8.

Montgomery, Hugh, et al.. (2011). Coming close to the ideal alternative: The concordant-ranks strategy. Judgment and Decision Making. 6(3). 196–210. 1 indexed citations

9.

Usher, Marius, et al.. (2011). The Impact of the Mode of Thought in Complex Decisions: Intuitive Decisions are Better. Frontiers in Psychology. 2. 37–37. 70 indexed citations

10.

Ayal, Shahar & Dan Zakay. (2009). The perceived diversity heuristic: The case of pseudodiversity.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 96(3). 559–573. 23 indexed citations

11.

Tsal, Yehoshua, Lilach Shalev, & Dan Zakay. (2005). The lengthening effect revisited: A reply to Prinzmetal and Wilson (1997) and Masin (1999). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 12(1). 185–190. 9 indexed citations

12.

Zakay, Dan & Richard A. Block. (2004). Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: an executive-control perspective. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis. 64(3). 319–328. 156 indexed citations

13.

Ariely, Dan & Dan Zakay. (2001). A timely account of the role of duration in decision making. Acta Psychologica. 108(2). 187–207. 148 indexed citations

14.

Block, Richard A., Peter A. Hancock, & Dan Zakay. (2000). Sex differences in duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Memory & Cognition. 28(8). 1333–1346. 118 indexed citations

15.

Zakay, Dan. (2000). Gating or switching? Gating is a better model of prospective timing (a response to ‘switching or gating?’ by Lejeune). Behavioural Processes. 52(2-3). 63–69. 55 indexed citations

16.

Lejeune, Helga, Françoise Macar, & Dan Zakay. (1999). Attention and timing: dual-task performance in pigeons. Behavioural Processes. 45(1-3). 141–157. 29 indexed citations

17.

Zakay, Dan. (1998). Determinants of Confidence in Accuracy of Knowledge Retrieval. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 10(3). 291–306. 4 indexed citations

18.

Zakay, Dan, et al.. (1998). Concurrent duration production as a workload measure. Ergonomics. 41(8). 1115–1128. 44 indexed citations

19.

Zakay, Dan. (1993). Relative and absolute duration judgments under prospective and retrospective paradigms. Perception & Psychophysics. 54(5). 656–664. 88 indexed citations

20.

Zakay, Dan. (1993). Time Estimation Methods—Do They Influence Prospective Duration Estimates?. Perception. 22(1). 91–101. 120 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact