Liz Smith

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Liz Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Liz Smith has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in General Health Professions, 2 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 2 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Liz Smith's work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). Liz Smith is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). Liz Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Liz Smith's co-authors include Anne Walker, Jeremy Grimshaw, Jill Francis, Martin Eccles, Marie Johnston, Eileen Kaner, Debbie Bonetti, Robbie Foy, Ken Gilhooly and Ruth McDonald and has published in prestigious journals such as Implementation Science, Applied Cognitive Psychology and Journal of Health Services Research & Policy.

In The Last Decade

Liz Smith

9 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planne... 2004 2026 2011 2018 2004 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Liz Smith United Kingdom 6 436 284 197 187 142 9 1.3k
Pamela Williams-Piehota United States 22 737 1.7× 294 1.0× 534 2.7× 250 1.3× 149 1.0× 72 1.8k
L. Suzanne Suggs Switzerland 22 811 1.9× 291 1.0× 381 1.9× 299 1.6× 91 0.6× 77 1.9k
Janet L. Johnson United States 20 452 1.0× 309 1.1× 315 1.6× 178 1.0× 111 0.8× 35 1.3k
Alexander K. Saeri Australia 14 445 1.0× 153 0.5× 155 0.8× 456 2.4× 84 0.6× 33 1.5k
Teamur Aghamolaei Iran 23 564 1.3× 148 0.5× 399 2.0× 169 0.9× 129 0.9× 162 1.9k
Dwayne Proctor United States 10 430 1.0× 185 0.7× 162 0.8× 365 2.0× 68 0.5× 13 1.2k
Majid Barati Iran 19 440 1.0× 237 0.8× 225 1.1× 197 1.1× 147 1.0× 182 1.6k
Kathleen Kelly United States 21 492 1.1× 155 0.5× 198 1.0× 231 1.2× 36 0.3× 56 1.3k
Marilyn Jacobs Quadrel United States 7 294 0.7× 309 1.1× 233 1.2× 435 2.3× 107 0.8× 10 1.4k
Serena McCluskey United Kingdom 10 532 1.2× 90 0.3× 293 1.5× 226 1.2× 81 0.6× 23 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Liz Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liz Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liz Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liz Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liz Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liz Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liz Smith. The network helps show where Liz Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liz Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liz Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liz Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Liz Smith. Liz Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Smith, Liz, et al.. (2019). This is our story: a qualitative research report on living with dementia. 1 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Liz. (2011). Retinopathy of prematurity from a neonatal nursing perspective. 2(6). 252–259. 1 indexed citations
3.
Francis, Jill, Martin Eccles, Marie Johnston, et al.. (2008). Explaining the effects of an intervention designed to promote evidence-based diabetes care: a theory-based process evaluation of a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. Implementation Science. 3(1). 50–50. 42 indexed citations
4.
Fotaki, Marianna, et al.. (2008). What benefits will choice bring to patients? Literature review and assessment of implications. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 13(3). 178–184. 132 indexed citations
5.
Smith, Liz & Ken Gilhooly. (2006). Regression versus fast and frugal models of decision-making: the case of prescribing for depression. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 20(2). 265–274. 31 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Liz. (2005). The ethics of neonatal care for the extremely preterm infant. Journal of Neonatal Nursing. 11(1). 33–37. 1 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Liz, Anne Walker, & Ken Gilhooly. (2004). Clinical guidelines of depression: a qualitative study of GPs' views.. PubMed. 53(7). 556–61. 27 indexed citations
8.
Francis, Jill, Martin Eccles, Marie Johnston, et al.. (2004). Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers. City Research Online (City University London). 1088 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Smith, Liz, Ken Gilhooly, & Anne Walker. (2002). Factors influencing prescribing decisions in the treatment of depression: a social judgement theory approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 17(1). 51–63. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026