Marco D’Αddario
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Patrizia StecaAndrea GrecoDario MonzaniLuca PancaniMarcello SariniMassimo MigliorettiLuca VecchioMaria Elena Magrin
- Topics
- Behavioral Health and Interventions (13 papers)Cardiac Health and Mental Health (10 papers)Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
In The Last Decade
Marco D’Αddario
53 papers receiving 817 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 192
- Clinical Psychology 191
- Social Psychology 182
- General Health Professions 182
- Applied Psychology 174
Countries citing papers authored by Marco D’Αddario
This map shows the geographic impact of Marco D’Αddario's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marco D’Αddario with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marco D’Αddario more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marco D’Αddario
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marco D’Αddario. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marco D’Αddario. The network helps show where Marco D’Αddario may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marco D’Αddario
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marco D’Αddario. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marco D’Αddario based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marco D’Αddario. Marco D’Αddario is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 44 | |
| 19 | Relationships of illness severity with depression, health- and life-satisfaction in patients with cardiovascular diseases | 1 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Marco D’Αddario
Marco D’Αddario is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Health Informatics, having authored 58 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (13 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (10 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (174 citations), Family Practice (46 citations) and Clinical Psychology (191 citations). Marco D’Αddario has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Belgium and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Patrizia Steca, Andrea Greco, Dario Monzani, Luca Pancani, Marcello Sarini, Massimo Miglioretti, Luca Vecchio, Maria Elena Magrin, Marta Scrignaro and Dario Baretta. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.