Keith Ewing

94 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

Keith Ewing
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Public Administration 225
  • Library and Information Sciences 31
  • Law 127
  • Political Science and International Relations 276
  • Industrial relations 3
Replace Cynthia J. Bowling with:
Cynthia J. Bowling United States
Josie Kelly United Kingdom
Mark Freedland United Kingdom
Norman J. Ornstein United States
Jon Erik Dølvik Norway
Susan M. Miller United States
Hazel Conley United Kingdom
Nicholas Pedriana United States
Samuel Krislov United States
Stephen A. Borrelli United States
Keith Ewing relative to Cynthia J. Bowling United States Cynthia J. Bowling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.5×
Cynthia J. Bowling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Ewing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Ewing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Ewing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Ewing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Ewing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Ewing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Ewing. The network helps show where Keith Ewing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith Ewing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Ewing Line = papers co-authored together Keith Ewing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199540
2 200540
3 199933
4 201030
5 201216
6
The Continuing Futility of the Human Rights Act
200815
7 199215
8 200414
9
A Manifesto for Labour Law: towards a comprehensive revision of workers' rights
201612
10 201311
11 202011
12 199811
13 200111
14
Money, politics, and law
19929
15 20179
16 20178
17 19918
18
Working life : a new perspective on labour law
19968
19 19957
20 19907

About Keith Ewing

Keith Ewing is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Law, Sociology and Political Science and Strategy and Management, having authored 107 papers that have together received 548 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (50 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (24 papers), Discrimination and Equality Law (11 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (10 papers), European and International Law Studies (9 papers), Legal principles and applications (7 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (7 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (225 citations), Library and Information Sciences (31 citations), Law (127 citations), Political Science and International Relations (276 citations) and Industrial relations (3 citations). Keith Ewing has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert Hauptman, Joo‐Cheong Tham, Conor Gearty, Navraj Singh Ghaleigh, Peter Nolan, Alan Bogg, Aileen McColgan, Stephen Wood, Sian Moore and Paul O’Higgins. Their work appears in journals such as Industrial Law Journal, The Cambridge Law Journal, Modern Law Review, Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy and British Journal of Industrial Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact