This map shows the geographic impact of Conor Gearty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conor Gearty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conor Gearty more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Conor Gearty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Conor Gearty. The network helps show where Conor Gearty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Conor Gearty
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Conor Gearty.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Conor Gearty based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Conor Gearty. Conor Gearty is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Downes, D., Paul Rock, Christine Chinkin, & Conor Gearty. (2013). Crime, Social Control and Human Rights : From Moral Panics to States of Denial, Essays in Honour of Stanley Cohen. Willan eBooks.16 indexed citations
5.
Economides, Kim, et al.. (2007). Can human rights survive?: a symposium on the 2005 Hamlyn lectures. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).2 indexed citations
6.
Downes, D., Paul Rock, Christine Chinkin, & Conor Gearty. (2007). Crime, social control and human rights: from moral panics to states of denial.9 indexed citations
7.
Gearty, Conor. (2007). Terrorism and Human Rights. Government and Opposition. 42(3). 340–362.19 indexed citations
Gearty, Conor. (2004). A misreading of the law. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).
10.
Gearty, Conor. (2003). Revisiting section 3(1) of the Human Rights Act. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).2 indexed citations
Gearty, Conor. (2002). Osman Unravels. Modern Law Review. 65(1). 87–96.2 indexed citations
13.
Gearty, Conor. (2001). Reflections on Human Rights and Civil Liberties in Light of the United Kingdom's Human Rights Act 1998. University of Richmond law review. 35(1). 1–25.1 indexed citations
14.
Gearty, Conor. (2001). Unravelling Osman. Modern Law Review. 64(2). 159–190.5 indexed citations
15.
Gearty, Conor & Stephen Davies. (2000). Insolvency practice and the Human Rights Act 1998. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).
16.
Gearty, Conor & Keith Ewing. (1997). Rocky foundations for Labour's new rights. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).1 indexed citations
17.
Gearty, Conor. (1997). European civil liberties and the European Convention on Human Rights: a comparative study.4 indexed citations
18.
Gearty, Conor. (1994). Political violence and civil liberties. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).1 indexed citations
19.
Gearty, Conor & Keith Ewing. (1994). Democracy or a bill of rights. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).1 indexed citations
20.
Gearty, Conor. (1992). The politics of abortion.. PubMed. 19(4). 441–53.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.