Modern Law Review

2.4k papers and 14.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.4k papers published in Modern Law Review in the last decades have received a total of 14.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Modern Law Review usually cover Law (1.5k papers), Political Science and International Relations (762 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (534 papers) specifically the topics of Legal principles and applications (889 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (281 papers) and Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (279 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Modern Law Review are Anthony Giddens, Richard Baldwin, Julia Black, Günther Teubner, Vlad Perju, Sundhya Pahuja, Neil Walker, Otto Kahn-Freund, Martti Koskenniemi and Paddy Ireland.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Modern Law Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Modern Law Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Modern Law Review.

Countries where authors publish in Modern Law Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Modern Law Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Modern Law Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modern Law Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025