Karen J. Pine

1.8k total citations
51 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Karen J. Pine is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Karen J. Pine has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 14 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 9 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Karen J. Pine's work include Hearing Impairment and Communication (18 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (14 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (7 papers). Karen J. Pine is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Impairment and Communication (18 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (14 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (7 papers). Karen J. Pine collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Türkiye and Canada. Karen J. Pine's co-authors include David Messer, Ben Fletcher, Elizabeth Kirk, Neil Howlett, Emma Flynn, Angela Thurnham, Charlie Lewis, Jörg B. Schulz, Sarah Critten and Nuala Ryder and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Development, Journal of Educational Psychology and Developmental Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Karen J. Pine

50 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Karen J. Pine United Kingdom 20 582 284 251 218 160 51 1.1k
Nairán Ramírez‐Esparza United States 19 599 1.0× 176 0.6× 370 1.5× 360 1.7× 244 1.5× 45 1.5k
Ana Paula Soares Portugal 23 610 1.0× 354 1.2× 410 1.6× 241 1.1× 95 0.6× 99 1.5k
Maurizio Tirassa Italy 19 310 0.5× 76 0.3× 203 0.8× 257 1.2× 177 1.1× 43 992
Stephen C. Want Canada 13 580 1.0× 85 0.3× 189 0.8× 349 1.6× 301 1.9× 25 1.1k
Fran C. Blumberg United States 19 409 0.7× 561 2.0× 141 0.6× 176 0.8× 166 1.0× 58 1.3k
Denise Davidson United States 20 492 0.8× 172 0.6× 167 0.7× 144 0.7× 184 1.1× 63 1.1k
Luigi Anolli Italy 17 124 0.2× 72 0.3× 384 1.5× 317 1.5× 178 1.1× 50 1.1k
Judith H. Danovitch United States 19 500 0.9× 370 1.3× 161 0.6× 267 1.2× 138 0.9× 55 1.1k
Asghar Iran‐Nejad United States 16 398 0.7× 298 1.0× 300 1.2× 249 1.1× 83 0.5× 59 965
Graham G. Scott United Kingdom 15 187 0.3× 77 0.3× 356 1.4× 244 1.1× 120 0.8× 34 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Karen J. Pine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karen J. Pine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen J. Pine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen J. Pine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karen J. Pine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen J. Pine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen J. Pine. The network helps show where Karen J. Pine may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen J. Pine

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen J. Pine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen J. Pine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen J. Pine. Karen J. Pine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Howlett, Neil, et al.. (2015). Unbuttoned: The Interaction Between Provocativeness of Female Work Attire and Occupational Status. Sex Roles. 72(3-4). 105–116. 36 indexed citations
2.
Kirk, Elizabeth, et al.. (2015). A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between maternal mind‐mindedness and theory of mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 33(4). 434–445. 52 indexed citations
3.
Pine, Karen J., et al.. (2013). The Gestural Misinformation Effect: Skewing Eyewitness Testimony Through Gesture. The American Journal of Psychology. 126(3). 301–314. 17 indexed citations
4.
Pine, Karen J., et al.. (2012). Giving cognition a helping hand: The effect of congruent gestures on object name retrieval. British Journal of Psychology. 104(1). 57–68. 5 indexed citations
5.
Pine, Karen J. & Kerttu Huttunen. (2012). Communication culture and gesture use. University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire). 1 indexed citations
6.
Kirk, Elizabeth, Neil Howlett, Karen J. Pine, & Ben Fletcher. (2012). To Sign or Not to Sign? The Impact of Encouraging Infants to Gesture on Infant Language and Maternal Mind-Mindedness. Child Development. 84(2). 574–590. 37 indexed citations
7.
Huttunen, Kerttu, Karen J. Pine, Angela Thurnham, & Christina T. Khan. (2012). The Changing Role of Gesture in Linguistic Development: A Developmental Trajectory and a Cross-Cultural Comparison Between British and Finnish Children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 42(1). 81–101. 17 indexed citations
8.
Howlett, Neil, Elizabeth Kirk, & Karen J. Pine. (2010). Does ‘Wanting the Best’ create more stress? The link between baby sign classes and maternal anxiety. Infant and Child Development. 20(4). 437–445. 6 indexed citations
9.
Kirk, Elizabeth, Karen J. Pine, & Nuala Ryder. (2010). I hear what you say but I see what you mean: The role of gestures in children's pragmatic comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes. 26(2). 149–170. 21 indexed citations
10.
Pine, Karen J., et al.. (2009). Dynamic assessment of learning ability improves outcome prediction following acquired brain injury. Brain Injury. 23(4). 278–290. 7 indexed citations
11.
Pine, Karen J., et al.. (2008). Television alcohol advertising: Do children really mean what they say?. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 27(1). 85–104. 30 indexed citations
12.
Bober, Magdalena, et al.. (2008). Learning in the family: parental engagement in children's learning with technology. 5 indexed citations
13.
Flynn, Emma, Karen J. Pine, & Charlie Lewis. (2007). Using the microgenetic method to investigate cognitive development: an introduction. Infant and Child Development. 16(1). 1–6. 17 indexed citations
14.
Pine, Karen J., et al.. (2007). The effects of prohibiting gestures on children's lexical retrieval ability. Developmental Science. 10(6). 747–754. 64 indexed citations
15.
Pine, Karen J., et al.. (2007). The Relationship Between Television Advertising, Children’s Viewing and Their Requests to Father Christmas. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 28(6). 456–461. 17 indexed citations
16.
Flynn, Emma, Karen J. Pine, & Charlie Lewis. (2006). The microgenetic method : time for change?. Psychologist. 19(3). 152–155. 14 indexed citations
17.
Fletcher, Ben, et al.. (2006). How visual images of chocolate affect the craving and guilt of female dieters. Appetite. 48(2). 211–217. 46 indexed citations
18.
Pine, Karen J., et al.. (2004). More gestures than answers: Children learning about balance.. Developmental Psychology. 40(6). 1059–1067. 123 indexed citations
19.
Pine, Karen J., et al.. (2003). Conceptualising and Assessing Young Children’s Knowledge of Television Advertising within a Framework of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge. Journal of Marketing Management. 19(3-4). 459–473. 16 indexed citations
20.
Pine, Karen J., et al.. (2003). Barbie or Betty? Preschool Children’s Preference for Branded Products and Evidence for Gender-Linked Differences. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 24(4). 219–224. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nairán Ramírez‐Esparza Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ana Paula Soares Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Maurizio Tirassa Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stephen C. Want Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fran C. Blumberg Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Denise Davidson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Luigi Anolli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Judith H. Danovitch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Asghar Iran‐Nejad Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Graham G. Scott
Rankless by CCL
2026