K. Rossiter

506 total citations
9 papers, 372 citations indexed

About

K. Rossiter is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, K. Rossiter has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 372 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Food Science, 5 papers in Plant Science and 4 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in K. Rossiter's work include Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (4 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (3 papers). K. Rossiter is often cited by papers focused on Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (4 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (3 papers). K. Rossiter collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Canada. K. Rossiter's co-authors include Sara R. Jaeger, F. Roger Harker, Wendy V. Wismer, H. Young, Mindy Wang, Matthew R. Miller, Bashir A. Lwaleed, Alan Cooper, David Voegeli and Shane Walker and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture and Food Quality and Preference.

In The Last Decade

K. Rossiter

8 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
K. Rossiter New Zealand	8	200	183	49	49	47	9	372
Hanne Sivertsen United States	15	334 1.7×	280 1.5×	68 1.4×	12 0.2×	63 1.3×	23	596
K. Jesionkowska Poland	10	274 1.4×	232 1.3×	68 1.4×	10 0.2×	38 0.8×	13	464
Vladimír Vietoris Slovakia	12	116 0.6×	225 1.2×	103 2.1×	16 0.3×	32 0.7×	44	455
Marina Leite Mitterer‐Daltoé Brazil	14	107 0.5×	347 1.9×	118 2.4×	37 0.8×	57 1.2×	50	563
Paul L. Brookfield New Zealand	10	282 1.4×	94 0.5×	25 0.5×	14 0.3×	28 0.6×	14	335
David H. Lyon United Kingdom	7	125 0.6×	410 2.2×	209 4.3×	17 0.3×	23 0.5×	8	574
Therese M. Work United States	9	146 0.7×	238 1.3×	83 1.7×	8 0.2×	43 0.9×	26	425
N. Nardo Italy	12	183 0.9×	133 0.7×	46 0.9×	18 0.4×	53 1.1×	27	349
Suzana Maria Della Lúcia Brazil	15	142 0.7×	382 2.1×	175 3.6×	15 0.3×	19 0.4×	57	609
Karen M. Weller United States	14	197 1.0×	377 2.1×	109 2.2×	13 0.3×	78 1.7×	22	484

Countries citing papers authored by K. Rossiter

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Rossiter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Rossiter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Rossiter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Rossiter

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Rossiter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Rossiter. The network helps show where K. Rossiter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Rossiter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Rossiter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Rossiter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Rossiter. K. Rossiter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Rossiter, K., Alan Cooper, David Voegeli, & Bashir A. Lwaleed. (2010). Honey promotes angiogeneic activity in the rat aortic ring assay. Journal of Wound Care. 19(10). 440–446. 43 indexed citations

2.

Harker, F. Roger, et al.. (2007). CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS AND PREFERENCES FOR KIWIFRUIT: A REVIEW. Acta Horticulturae. 81–88. 21 indexed citations

3.

Rossiter, K., Pankti Reid, Bashir A. Lwaleed, et al.. (2006). Honey and angiogenesis. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).

4.

Wismer, Wendy V., F. Roger Harker, Anne Gunson, et al.. (2005). Identifying flavour targets for fruit breeding: A kiwifruit example. Euphytica. 141(1-2). 93–104. 34 indexed citations

5.

Jaeger, Sara R., et al.. (2004). Consumer perceptions of novel fruit and familiar fruit: a repertory grid application. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 85(3). 480–488. 44 indexed citations

6.

Marsh, Ken, et al.. (2003). THE USE OF FRUIT PULPS TO EXPLORE FLAVOUR IN KIWIFRUIT. Acta Horticulturae. 229–237. 17 indexed citations

7.

Jaeger, Sara R., K. Rossiter, Wendy V. Wismer, & F. Roger Harker. (2002). Consumer-driven product development in the kiwifruit industry. Food Quality and Preference. 14(3). 187–198. 127 indexed citations

8.

Rossiter, K., et al.. (2000). THE EFFECTS OF SUGARS AND ACIDS ON CONSUMER ACCEPTABILITY OF KIWIFRUIT. Journal of Sensory Studies. 15(3). 241–250. 36 indexed citations

9.

Young, H., K. Rossiter, Mindy Wang, & Matthew R. Miller. (1999). Characterization of Royal Gala Apple Aroma Using Electronic Nose TechnologyPotential Maturity Indicator. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 47(12). 5173–5177. 50 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact