Julie McCredden
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Graeme S. HalfordRosemary BakerJohn BainDavid B. KnightTom E. BaldockDavid P. CallaghanJan H. F. MeyerLiza O’Moore
- Topics
- Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers)Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers)Experimental Learning in Engineering (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
Julie McCredden
9 papers receiving 322 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Artificial Intelligence 94
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 84
- Cognitive Neuroscience 52
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 51
- Social Psychology 37
Countries citing papers authored by Julie McCredden
This map shows the geographic impact of Julie McCredden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie McCredden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie McCredden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julie McCredden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie McCredden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie McCredden. The network helps show where Julie McCredden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie McCredden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie McCredden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie McCredden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie McCredden. Julie McCredden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | What to do with a threshold concept: a case study | 6 |
| 2 | Project design and scaffolding for realising practitioner learning in a large first year flipped classroom course | 1 |
| 3 | Exploring the quality and effectiveness of online, focused peer discussions using the MOOCchat tool | 1 |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Relcon: A Tensor Model of Relational Categorization | 1 |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 306 | |
| 9 | 17 |
About Julie McCredden
Julie McCredden is a scholar working on Media Technology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education, having authored 9 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (84 citations), Health Informatics (6 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). Julie McCredden has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Graeme S. Halford, Rosemary Baker, John Bain, David B. Knight, Tom E. Baldock, David P. Callaghan, Jan H. F. Meyer, Liza O’Moore, Carl Reidsema and Lydia Kavanagh. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Science, Kidney International and Learning and Instruction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.