Judith Pena‐Shaff
- Education top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Communication top 5%
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Topics
- Online and Blended Learning (4 papers)Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers)Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Judith Pena‐Shaff
9 papers receiving 480 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Education 358
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 294
- Communication 136
- Computer Science Applications 89
- Social Psychology 83
Countries citing papers authored by Judith Pena‐Shaff
This map shows the geographic impact of Judith Pena‐Shaff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith Pena‐Shaff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith Pena‐Shaff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Judith Pena‐Shaff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith Pena‐Shaff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith Pena‐Shaff. The network helps show where Judith Pena‐Shaff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Judith Pena‐Shaff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Judith Pena‐Shaff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Judith Pena‐Shaff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Judith Pena‐Shaff. Judith Pena‐Shaff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 29 | |
| 4 | Student Interaction and Knowledge Construction in Case-Based Learning in Educational Psychology using Online Discussions: The Role of Structure | 9 |
| 5 | Case-Based Instruction Using Asynchronous Online Discussions: A Synthesis | 9 |
| 6 | Predictors of College Student Suicidal Ideation: Gender Differences. | 66 |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | Asynchronous Online Discussions as a Tool for Learning: Students' Attitudes, Expectations, and Perceptions. | 57 |
| 9 | 306 | |
| 10 | An Epistemological Framework for Analyzing Student Interactions in Computer-Mediated Communication Environments | 73 |
About Judith Pena‐Shaff
Judith Pena‐Shaff is a scholar working on General Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education, having authored 10 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (294 citations), Communication (136 citations) and Computer Science Applications (89 citations). Judith Pena‐Shaff has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Craig Nicholls, Wendy Martin, Brandy Bessette-Symons and Michael L. Tate. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Education, Frontiers in Psychology and Race Ethnicity and Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.