Judith Pena‐Shaff

848 total citations
10 papers, 560 citations indexed

About

Judith Pena‐Shaff is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Judith Pena‐Shaff has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 560 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Education, 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 2 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Judith Pena‐Shaff's work include Online and Blended Learning (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers). Judith Pena‐Shaff is often cited by papers focused on Online and Blended Learning (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers). Judith Pena‐Shaff collaborates with scholars based in United States. Judith Pena‐Shaff's co-authors include Craig Nicholls, Wendy Martin, Brandy Bessette-Symons and Michael L. Tate and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers & Education, Frontiers in Psychology and Race Ethnicity and Education.

In The Last Decade

Judith Pena‐Shaff

9 papers receiving 480 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Judith Pena‐Shaff United States	8	358	294	136	89	83	10	560
Clare Brett Canada	12	378 1.1×	257 0.9×	73 0.5×	128 1.4×	63 0.8×	38	550
Maarit Arvaja Finland	15	395 1.1×	331 1.1×	94 0.7×	61 0.7×	82 1.0×	26	601
Palitha Edırısıngha United Kingdom	13	420 1.2×	135 0.5×	118 0.9×	107 1.2×	44 0.5×	27	617
Renee Kaufmann United States	14	390 1.1×	92 0.3×	56 0.4×	61 0.7×	264 3.2×	40	636
Robert Lücking United States	9	373 1.0×	198 0.7×	62 0.5×	64 0.7×	32 0.4×	30	533
Hope Jordan United States	2	495 1.4×	179 0.6×	40 0.3×	149 1.7×	40 0.5×	3	615
Jorge Larreamendy-Joerns United States	6	499 1.4×	278 0.9×	30 0.2×	102 1.1×	31 0.4×	11	638
Joan L. Whipp United States	10	488 1.4×	191 0.6×	35 0.3×	64 0.7×	48 0.6×	17	603
Jekaterina Rogaten United Kingdom	12	207 0.6×	71 0.2×	46 0.3×	100 1.1×	58 0.7×	26	431
Erica C. Boling United States	9	389 1.1×	130 0.4×	24 0.2×	68 0.8×	42 0.5×	16	495

Countries citing papers authored by Judith Pena‐Shaff

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Judith Pena‐Shaff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith Pena‐Shaff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith Pena‐Shaff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Judith Pena‐Shaff

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith Pena‐Shaff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith Pena‐Shaff. The network helps show where Judith Pena‐Shaff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Judith Pena‐Shaff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Judith Pena‐Shaff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Judith Pena‐Shaff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Judith Pena‐Shaff. Judith Pena‐Shaff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Pena‐Shaff, Judith, et al.. (2023). Caregivers’ anxiety and perception of their children’s wellbeing: a year into the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. 1115322–1115322. 1 indexed citations

Pena‐Shaff, Judith, et al.. (2021). Student Preparedness and Success in Introductory Psychology. Teaching of Psychology. 49(3). 236–244.

Pena‐Shaff, Judith, et al.. (2018). Racial and ethnic differences in high school students’ perceptions of school climate and disciplinary practices. Race Ethnicity and Education. 22(2). 269–284. 29 indexed citations

Pena‐Shaff, Judith, et al.. (2015). Student Interaction and Knowledge Construction in Case-Based Learning in Educational Psychology using Online Discussions: The Role of Structure. Digital Collections - Ithaca College Library (Ithaca College). 26(3). 307–329. 9 indexed citations

Pena‐Shaff, Judith, et al.. (2009). Case-Based Instruction Using Asynchronous Online Discussions: A Synthesis. Journal on excellence in college teaching. 20(3). 97–121. 9 indexed citations

Pena‐Shaff, Judith, et al.. (2006). Predictors of College Student Suicidal Ideation: Gender Differences.. College student journal. 40(1). 109–117. 66 indexed citations

Pena‐Shaff, Judith, et al.. (2006). An Inclusive Process for Departmental Textbook Selection. Teaching of Psychology. 33(4). 228–231. 10 indexed citations

Pena‐Shaff, Judith, et al.. (2005). Asynchronous Online Discussions as a Tool for Learning: Students' Attitudes, Expectations, and Perceptions.. The Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 16(4). 409–430. 57 indexed citations

Pena‐Shaff, Judith & Craig Nicholls. (2003). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education. 42(3). 243–265. 306 indexed citations

10.

Pena‐Shaff, Judith & Wendy Martin. (2001). An Epistemological Framework for Analyzing Student Interactions in Computer-Mediated Communication Environments. The Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 12(1). 41–68. 73 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact