Jonathan Pinto

969 total citations
27 papers, 612 citations indexed

About

Jonathan Pinto is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Pinto has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 612 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Pinto's work include Management and Organizational Studies (8 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (5 papers). Jonathan Pinto is often cited by papers focused on Management and Organizational Studies (8 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (5 papers). Jonathan Pinto collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Vietnam. Jonathan Pinto's co-authors include Frits K. Pil, Carrie R. Leana, Gerard Beenen, Mark A. Stein, Muthu De Silva, Dragana Radičić, Omar Al‐Tabbaa, Kevin S. Cruz, Maziar Nekovee and Pratima Bansal and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Academy of Management Review and Research Policy.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Pinto

22 papers receiving 567 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan Pinto United Kingdom 10 278 184 168 151 65 27 612
Rajeev R. Bhattacharya Australia 3 191 0.7× 104 0.6× 123 0.7× 200 1.3× 47 0.7× 4 576
David M. Wasieleski United States 15 139 0.5× 267 1.5× 182 1.1× 168 1.1× 37 0.6× 37 618
John H. Barnett United States 5 122 0.4× 205 1.1× 144 0.9× 141 0.9× 100 1.5× 12 561
Dilek Zamantılı Nayır Türkiye 13 185 0.7× 125 0.7× 245 1.5× 139 0.9× 60 0.9× 32 592
Shaz Ansari United Kingdom 9 173 0.6× 64 0.3× 250 1.5× 251 1.7× 46 0.7× 22 606
Linda M. Sama United States 12 81 0.3× 143 0.8× 157 0.9× 117 0.8× 71 1.1× 26 467
Bilian Ni Sullivan Hong Kong 10 114 0.4× 61 0.3× 225 1.3× 125 0.8× 110 1.7× 19 486
Sam Fullerton United States 11 213 0.8× 218 1.2× 190 1.1× 169 1.1× 96 1.5× 51 771
Ann‐Marie Nienaber United Kingdom 11 124 0.4× 65 0.4× 142 0.8× 228 1.5× 46 0.7× 37 523
Dennis Wittmer United States 11 170 0.6× 149 0.8× 107 0.6× 221 1.5× 22 0.3× 21 623

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Pinto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Pinto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Pinto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Pinto. The network helps show where Jonathan Pinto may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Pinto

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Pinto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Pinto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Pinto. Jonathan Pinto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bacq, Sophie, Maribel Guerrero, Donald S. Siegel, & Jonathan Pinto. (2025). Entrepreneurship as an Academic Field: Taking Stock and New Directions. International Journal of Management Reviews. 27(4). 457–465.
2.
Bui, Hong, et al.. (2024). Moderators of the relationship between turnover intentions and performance. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(2). 82–99. 2 indexed citations
3.
Kunisch, Sven, Dodo zu Knyphausen‐Aufseß, Hari Bapuji, et al.. (2023). Using review articles to address societal grand challenges. International Journal of Management Reviews. 25(2). 240–250. 31 indexed citations
4.
Wang, Wanxin, et al.. (2023). When Does Competence Matter? Character as a Moderator in the Development of Trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 51(11). 2231–2247.
5.
Srivastava, Abhishek & Jonathan Pinto. (2022). Dynamic linkages of empowering and transformational leadership with knowledge sharing in project teams. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 20(4). 571–579. 6 indexed citations
6.
Silva, Muthu De, Omar Al‐Tabbaa, & Jonathan Pinto. (2022). Academics engaging in knowledge transfer and co-creation: Push causation and pull effectuation?. Research Policy. 52(2). 104668–104668. 26 indexed citations
7.
Cruz, Kevin S. & Jonathan Pinto. (2019). Team Focus in Focus: Its Implications for Real Teams and Their Members. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 35(2). 123–133. 9 indexed citations
8.
Bui, Hong, Jonathan Pinto, & Abhishek Srivastava. (2019). Sexualization of the work environment and emotional exhaustion. International Journal of Manpower. 40(4). 558–573. 3 indexed citations
9.
Pinto, Jonathan. (2019). Key to Effective Organizational Performance Management Lies at the Intersection of Paradox Theory and Stakeholder Theory. International Journal of Management Reviews. 21(2). 185–208. 53 indexed citations
10.
Pinto, Jonathan. (2017). Viewing team selection through a temporal lens. Organizational Psychology Review. 7(2). 171–194. 5 indexed citations
11.
Pinto, Jonathan. (2017). A multifocal framework for developing Intentionally Sustainable Organizations. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 28. 17–23. 9 indexed citations
12.
Pinto, Jonathan. (2016). ‘Wow! That’s so cool!’ The Icehotel as organizational trope. Human Relations. 69(4). 891–914. 23 indexed citations
13.
Pinto, Jonathan, et al.. (2015). Moderators of the Relationship between Turnover Intentions and Performance. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2015(1). 18394–18394.
14.
Pinto, Jonathan. (2014). Entrepreneurs' Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Entrepreneurial Team Recruitment.. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2014(1). 13976–13976. 5 indexed citations
15.
Stein, Mark A. & Jonathan Pinto. (2011). The Dark Side of Groups. Group & Organization Management. 36(6). 692–721. 20 indexed citations
16.
Pinto, Jonathan & P Stacey. (2010). What's in a Name? Just the Essence of One's Professional Identity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 3(3). 277–280. 2 indexed citations
17.
Pinto, Jonathan & P Stacey. (2010). What's in a Name? Just the Essence of One's Professional Identity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 3(3). 277–280. 1 indexed citations
18.
Beenen, Gerard & Jonathan Pinto. (2009). Resisting Organizational-Level Corruption: An Interview With Sherron Watkins. Academy of Management Learning and Education. 8(2). 275–289. 33 indexed citations
19.
Pinto, Jonathan. (2008). Biases and Heuristics in Team Member Selection Decisions. D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh). 3 indexed citations
20.
Pinto, Jonathan, Carrie R. Leana, & Frits K. Pil. (2008). Corrupt Organizations or Organizations of Corrupt Individuals? Two Types of Organization-Level Corruption. Academy of Management Review. 33(3). 685–709. 337 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rajeev R. Bhattacharya Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David M. Wasieleski Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John H. Barnett Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dilek Zamantılı Nayır Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shaz Ansari Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Linda M. Sama Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bilian Ni Sullivan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sam Fullerton Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ann‐Marie Nienaber Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dennis Wittmer
Rankless by CCL
2026