John Pearce

7.4k citations
274 papers · 4.9k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 36

John Pearce

255 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Hit Papers

Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a c...6031994202620042015200400600

Peers

John Pearce
Comparison fields: 5 of 196
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.5k
  • Sensory Systems 355
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 613
  • Neurology 712
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 158
Replace Michael E. Smith with:
Michael E. Smith United States
Robert Thompson United States
Stanley Finger United States
Stephen C. Fowler United States
David J. Barker United States
Roel A. Ophoff Netherlands
Dale R. Nyholt Australia
Merlin G. Butler United States
Michelle Luciano United Kingdom
William A. Spencer United States
John Pearce relative to Michael E. Smith United States Michael E. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Michael E. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Pearce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Pearce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pearce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pearce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Pearce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pearce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pearce. The network helps show where John Pearce may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Pearce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Pearce Line = papers co-authored together John Pearce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20230
3 20154
4
Representations and realities: cemeteries as evidence for women in Roman Britain.
20115
5 200930
6 20084
7 200646
8 200413
9
Proceedings of the 6th Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference
19982
10 19953
11 198328
12 197814
13 197713
14 19723
15 19719
16 19681
17 19659
18 196560
19 19646
20
Growth studies of beef calves.
19611

About John Pearce

John Pearce is a scholar working on Space and Planetary Science, Neurology and History, having authored 274 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurology and Historical Studies (31 papers), History of Medicine Studies (24 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (21 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (18 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (14 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (12 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (12 papers) and History of Medical Practice (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Sensory Systems (355 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (613 citations). John Pearce has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Mark Good, Anthony McGregor, R. J. Pennington, Hugh Garland, J. N. Walton, N. Paul Rosman, Henri Duday, J. N. Walton, Peter M. Jones and Paul N. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Britannia, The Lancet, Postgraduate Medical Journal and European Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026