Hesperia The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens · 1×
×2.31k/441SPS
×0.85k/6kARCHE
×0.73k/4kANTHR
×1.22k/2kPALEO
×1.4260/185ARCHE
Citations per year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Countries where authors publish in Britannia
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Britannia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Britannia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Britannia more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Britannia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Britannia.
About Britannia
The 1.5k papers published in Britannia in the last decades have received a total of 9.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Britannia usually cover Space and Planetary Science (145 papers), Archeology (667 papers), Anthropology (396 papers), Archeology (25 papers) and History (196 papers) specifically the topics of Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (373 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (359 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (190 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (145 papers), Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (129 papers), Historical and Architectural Studies (112 papers), Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (111 papers) and Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (111 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Britannia are Michael Fulford, Richard Hingley, R. S. O. Tomlin, S. S. Frere, Barry Cunliffe, Martin Millett, Richard Reece, David R. Wilson, W. S. Hanson and M. W. C. Hassall.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.