Mark Good

8.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
127 papers, 6.5k citations indexed

About

Mark Good is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Good has authored 127 papers receiving a total of 6.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 83 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 60 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 27 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Mark Good's work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (82 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (56 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (23 papers). Mark Good is often cited by papers focused on Memory and Neural Mechanisms (82 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (56 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (23 papers). Mark Good collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Mark Good's co-authors include R. C. Honey, David M. Bannerman, Anthony McGregor, John M. Pearce, J. N. P. Rawlins, Richard Morris, John Pearce, Steven P. Butcher, Mark Ramsay and Vanessa Marshall and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of Neuroscience and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Mark Good

124 papers receiving 6.4k citations

Hit Papers

Impaired synaptic plasticity and learning in aged amyloid... 1999 2026 2008 2017 1999 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Good United Kingdom 41 4.0k 3.5k 1.1k 911 910 127 6.5k
Christopher L. Cunningham United States 50 2.5k 0.6× 4.9k 1.4× 959 0.8× 764 0.8× 2.3k 2.5× 180 8.0k
Robert J. McDonald Canada 49 6.3k 1.6× 5.2k 1.5× 1.1k 0.9× 1.8k 1.9× 1.4k 1.5× 152 10.4k
Ricardo Insausti Spain 44 4.3k 1.1× 3.3k 0.9× 829 0.7× 405 0.4× 776 0.9× 121 7.1k
Hisao Nishijo Japan 48 4.0k 1.0× 2.1k 0.6× 714 0.6× 525 0.6× 823 0.9× 312 8.0k
Susan J. Sara France 47 7.3k 1.8× 5.3k 1.5× 538 0.5× 1.1k 1.2× 1.4k 1.6× 104 9.8k
Michael E. Ragozzino United States 43 3.8k 1.0× 3.6k 1.0× 553 0.5× 797 0.9× 1.5k 1.7× 88 6.4k
Joseph P. Huston Germany 47 2.9k 0.7× 5.0k 1.4× 947 0.8× 835 0.9× 2.7k 3.0× 255 8.7k
Barry Setlow United States 48 4.2k 1.1× 4.3k 1.2× 429 0.4× 1.4k 1.5× 1.3k 1.4× 135 7.3k
DG Amaral United States 21 4.7k 1.2× 3.9k 1.1× 528 0.5× 514 0.6× 635 0.7× 23 6.4k
Malcolm W. Brown United Kingdom 33 4.5k 1.1× 3.2k 0.9× 328 0.3× 406 0.4× 834 0.9× 61 6.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Good

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Good more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Good

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Good. The network helps show where Mark Good may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Good

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Good. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Good based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Good. Mark Good is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Keshavan, Matcheri S. & Mark Good. (2025). Rethinking psychosis: Time to retire “organic”, “idiopathic” and “secondary”?. Schizophrenia Research. 285. 132–133.
3.
Good, Mark, et al.. (2023). The 5:2 diet does not increase adult hippocampal neurogenesis or enhance spatial memory in mice. EMBO Reports. 24(12). e57269–e57269. 4 indexed citations
4.
Bevan, Ryan J., Daryn R. Michael, Sophie R. Thomas, et al.. (2023). Assessment of Lab4P Probiotic Effects on Cognition in 3xTg-AD Alzheimer’s Disease Model Mice and the SH-SY5Y Neuronal Cell Line. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 24(5). 4683–4683. 14 indexed citations
5.
Good, Mark, et al.. (2023). Cognitive comorbidities of experimental absence seizures are independent of anxiety. Neurobiology of Disease. 186. 106275–106275. 4 indexed citations
6.
7.
O’Hagan, Caroline, Jia V. Li, Julian R. Marchesi, et al.. (2017). Long-term multi-species Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium dietary supplement enhances memory and changes regional brain metabolites in middle-aged rats. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 144. 36–47. 79 indexed citations
8.
Honey, R. C., Mihaela D Iordanova, & Mark Good. (2013). Associative structures in animal learning: Dissociating elemental and configural processes. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 108. 96–103. 31 indexed citations
9.
Lelos, Mariah J., Rhian S. Thomas, Emma J. Kidd, & Mark Good. (2011). Outcome-specific satiety reveals a deficit in context-outcome, but not stimulus- or action-outcome, associations in aged Tg2576 mice.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 125(3). 412–425. 7 indexed citations
10.
Iordanova, Mihaela D, et al.. (2011). Pattern memory involves both elemental and configural processes: Evidence from the effects of hippocampal lesions.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 125(4). 567–577. 15 indexed citations
11.
Sanderson, David J., Mark Good, Kelly Skelton, et al.. (2009). Enhanced long-term and impaired short-term spatial memory in GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit knockout mice: Evidence for a dual-process memory model (vol 16, 379, 2009). Learning & Memory. 16. 508–508. 1 indexed citations
12.
Good, Mark, et al.. (2007). Context- but not familiarity-dependent forms of object recognition are impaired following excitotoxic hippocampal lesions in rats.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 121(1). 218–223. 95 indexed citations
13.
Jones, Peter M., John M. Pearce, Vanessa Davies, Mark Good, & Anthony McGregor. (2007). Impaired processing of local geometric features during navigation in a water maze following hippocampal lesions in rats.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 121(6). 1258–1271. 32 indexed citations
14.
McGregor, Anthony, Peter M. Jones, Mark Good, & John Pearce. (2006). Further evidence that rats rely on local rather than global spatial information to locate a hidden goal: Reply to Cheng and Gallistel (2005).. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 32(3). 314–321. 46 indexed citations
15.
Pearce, John M., et al.. (2006). Potentiation, overshadowing, and blocking of spatial learning based on the shape of the environment.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 32(3). 201–214. 112 indexed citations
16.
Day, Mark L. & Mark Good. (2004). Ovariectomy-induced disruption of long-term synaptic depression in the hippocampal CA1 region in vivo is attenuated with chronic estrogen replacement. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 83(1). 13–21. 40 indexed citations
17.
Good, Mark. (2002). Spatial memory and hippocampal function: Where are we now?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 30 indexed citations
18.
Bannerman, David M., et al.. (2001). Contextual fear conditioning is disrupted by lesions of the subcortical, but not entorhinal, connections to the hippocampus. Experimental Brain Research. 141(3). 304–311. 28 indexed citations
19.
Good, Mark & R. C. Honey. (1997). Dissociable effects of selective lesions to hippocampal subsystems on exploratory behavior, contextual learning, and spatial learning.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 111(3). 487–493. 167 indexed citations
20.
Honey, R. C., Alanna J. Watt, & Mark Good. (1997). Abolition of the associative modulation of stimulus processing in hippocampal rats. The Society for Neuroscience Abstracts. 23. 1597. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026